Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Napier International Technologies Inc. (T.NIR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ginco who wrote (787)	7/10/1998 10:40:00 PM
From: 1emtil	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 2444

Certainly Gino, although I know everyone else is going to go nuts on me for doing so. Of cuourse if I don't you'll never let it go and I'll get blamed for your repeated questioning, so I lose either way. You posted the disclaimer from Madedel, that includes the statement ".......Please assume that the wrtiers and employees may and often do buy and sell the securities contained herein, and that the owner of the publication, ProTrader Finanz AG, and its associates and employees do on occasion arrange for a fee financing and, for a fee, offer financial advice to companies whose securities are featured or otherwise mentioned herein." Long ago at Stockhouse I posted a list of companies that had been featured in Maedels at various times. I'll again give you a few (checkout multi year charts on these - can you guess when they were reccomended?) Awm.a ctq.v egd.v esx.v izp.v jba.a xnx.a pcs.v(now ubs.v) ptd.v tti.t etc. Not that one can't make money buying Maedel picks (I just bought one I think he still covers), just that many shoot to insane levels and have rather harsh landings. I only brought that up because of the tremendous weight that was being given to that article that was repeatedly copied onto the forums. While that article sound tremendous, the ones for the above companies and many others sounded equally great. As for Aelicks, check out his background at the NIR site (geology), and check out the mutiyear charts for cmv.v and ptd.v. It is beyond me why I must keep repeating this, but once again, the reference to 'scam' was in discussing the nature of some posters agenda and their repeated false statements, that will forever be preserved no matter what NiR's outcome will be (ex. 'Insiders buying big!!). I have never said NIR is a scam, the majority of my statements have been directed at doubting overly exuberant statements made on the forums, Facts about insider trading, correct media quotes, and general statements about market tendancies. I have repeatedly indicated not having any particular knowledge of paint strippers. I must wonder, if one assumes the following to be correct(as most seem to):The US aircraft stripping industry is valued @$100m, MC use will end the end of AUG, No one else has a product remotely close to NIR,Piles of other industries will use NIR products, NIR will soon have products in the consumer market, - why is the share price at @2.30? If they are about to start having revenue at $8m/month to the aircraft industry alone, why is the market not discounting this? The share price should already be towards $10. Many have posted about how ICI employess like the stock, Mcdonnel Dougless emploes are interested in the stock, 'Detroit' people like the stock, many on this forum are 'desparate' to bu more, reporting insiders and pseudo insiders are surely aware of more than anyone here, and have no doubt told friends and relatives of this great opportunity. Why is share price going sideways to down? Thats it for me, I'm off for tonight. Edit: response to last post - No, I didn't but I would have done quite well had I shorted when it failed on the last rally. Unfortunately, I don't have the funds to simultaniously have positions in every company on the board, and I had other positions at the time (Gino - you found one I had a long position in at SH, but I had already sold). As for why I post to NIR with no position, I would NEVER be involved in this type of discussion with a company I held any signifigant postition in - too much potential to cloud judgement. As for how much time I have spent 'researching' NIR, I have repeatedly pointed out I have done no particular research. Rather stunning that those who claim to have done so didn't have a clue as to insider sales or shares F/D, don't you thinK?