Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Children's Beverage Group (TCBG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Earl Falwell who wrote (765)	7/10/1998 11:50:00 PM
From: Cavalry	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2452

Thanks Earl you are right, Shoot i apologize, been a long day of getting bashed before the plane is even off the runway, what will this thread be like with TCBG over $2.50 one day. Seems like the same juice pack is either half full or half empty for different people. Cav

To: Earl Falwell who wrote (765)	7/10/1998 11:54:00 PM
From: Jaste	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2452

Boy, not too long ago I had asked why there were very few posts showing up on this board considering how well the stock is doing, and how promising a future lies in this co. Perhaps I should issue an apology for asking? Can someone speak to Jill and try to get her to delete the last 100 or so odd posts. Can't see any relevance in them except for the odd few. Quick question, Slyfox (I think that's what you called yourself) are you Big Dog, or was I just confused? Shoot 1st. In answer to your question with regards to why they choose Unser, I can only offer this tidbit of info. that was presented to me by a knowledgable somebody involved in auto-racing. There is a strong possibility that for 1) Cheever may retire soon and focus his attention on ownership in CART 2) The IRL may disappear in two years 3) Unser is a strong candidate to graduate to CART under the ownership of Cheever 4) The deal signed by TCBG and Wal mart should remain standing if both 1 & 3 were to happen. You may ask why TCBG didn't just sponsor a car in CART. Well that would probably be due to the fact that there is not a well-known name left in CART currently searching for a sponsor, if there are any cars left in CART at all that need sponsoring. Which brings me back to points 1, 2, and 4. Hope that helps. Just a note to J. about his opinion on sponsoring a race car being "useless". Think about it for one second - The Children's Beverage Company & race cars. Race cars and The Children's Beverage Company. 1+1=2. Great week, and TCBG continues to show the same pattern I mentioned before. It's searching for a higher base. Could J. be Luke?

To: Earl Falwell who wrote (765)	7/11/1998 12:24:00 AM
From: Peter Prickett	Respond to of 2452

To all: What a shame. The last 150 posts or so have been nothing but personal attacks between a few posters. I am also disapointed in SI. They should be policing the message boards. I am often amazed at how bold and obnoxious some people can be while hiding behind the anonymity of the internet. Just as puzzling, why do some of you respond to a j. danials and related personalities? Except I must admit, the discourse has been most entertaining. Anyway, I'm the one who wants to see financials, forecasts, etc. I did have a 20 minute talk today with the investor relations house that the company has hired. While they don't have financials to give me ( which still troubles me) they were quite open to my questions. Don't have time to get into stuff yet except to confirm much of what has been expressed previously. Did get some financial info which I will attempt to extrapolate and express further after some analysis. Unless of course this circus act of a chat room continues in which case I'm out-a-here. One final thought. Have you ever noticed that after the bozo's start taking over a chat board most of the normal people with a keen interest in the subject matter won't post anymore? Too bad. Pete