Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Krowbar who wrote (23482)	7/11/1998 1:15:00 AM
From: Grainne	Respond to of 108807

<<Greenpeace is anti-children now? I suppose so if an expert like you says so.>> Del, I suspect that it is Rush Limbaugh and the others of his ilk who have proclaimed Greenpeace as anti-children. Conservative radio in this country really polarizes people!

To: Krowbar who wrote (23482)	7/11/1998 1:19:00 AM
From: greenspirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Del, do I detect you getting a little hot under the collar there? Gee, sorry to disappoint you that the overpopulation doom and gloom scenario many "ultra liberal left wingers" on this thread predicted last year are not as severe as you thought. :-) Yeah, your right, it was nearly impossible to see that as more and more countries became industrialized and wealthier there birth rates would drop. Took real rocket science there Del?? Just like it takes real rocket science to predict that 50 or 100 years from now, as the world develops and becomes more industrialized and wealthier, we will find alternate sources of cheap non-polluting energy. I guess that will disappoint a lot of "Global Warming" doom and gloomers too. :-) Not to worry though, The gloom and doom scenario's of satellites falling out of orbit should keep all you Greenpeacer's happy then. :-) Michael