SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ForYourEyesOnly who wrote (20430)7/11/1998 10:11:00 AM
From: John Mansfield  Respond to of 31646
 
'Talk : $5 and Under : American International Industries Inc. OTC BB Symbol EDII

<from:
exchange2000.com
John >

| Previous | Next | Respond | Remove Navigation

To: findstock (110 )
From: SI Admin (Bob)
Saturday, Jul 11 1998 1:32AM ET
Reply # of 317

Tonight I've seen many things on this thread and a few others that
really irk me. Enough so that I feel compelled to state my position
on these issues publicly.

First off, I just permanently banned the accounts of 3 people who
took it upon themselves to post what they claim is the home
address and phone number of a fellow member. And someone who
stated they were going to post that info every morning just got a
14-day suspension.

And each further occurrence of that information is going to result in
account termination. Period.

Invasion of the privacy of our members is something that simply
will not be tolerated, and my reaction will always be extreme.

Those who were suspended or terminated for that need not even try
appealing the decision for at least 14 days. Not only is such
behaviour unconscionable, it is a blatant violation of the Terms of
Use. And I've gone on record before stating just how seriously we
take this matter. It quite simply is not allowed.

Very interesting when that particular violation is committed by
those obviously using an alias. Wonder how they'd feel if what
they did to another user had been done to them.

On another matter, I've seen many personal attacks on this thread.

I'm going to read all of the messages that were posted to this thread
today and take appropriate action as needed. If my initial browse
was any indication, there won't be many people posting here
tomorrow. It looks like there has been a complete free-for-all in
here, with some people choosing to personally attack anyone who
disagrees with them.

That is inappropriate and will be dealt with.

The fact that we have, and enforce, our Terms of Use is a major
part of what separates us from so many other venues. Those who
are unable to use this site in a civil manner in compliance with the
letter and spirit of the Terms of Use may feel free to avail
themselves of another site whose rules, or lack thereof, is more to
their liking.

Regards,

SI Admin (Bob)

PS. Any replies need to come to me via PM or email at
mailto:si_adming@techstocks.com

I won't be answering publicly.
___

From:
exchange2000.com



To: ForYourEyesOnly who wrote (20430)7/11/1998 10:45:00 AM
From: John Mansfield  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 31646
 
'Clinton Y2K Speech Expected
President Clinton and Vice President Gore are expected to make a major speech
Tuesday, July 14, on Year 2000 at the National Academy of Sciences in
Washington, D.C. Among the issues the President is expected to raise in the
context of Y2K readiness is the need for legislation encouraging a free flowing
and substantive exchange of information. It is also expected that the
announcement and subsequent legislation will correspond with previous statements
of Y2K Czar John Koskinen. This includes the ability of companies to share as
much goodfaith, factual Y2K information as possible in as short a time as
possible--without those statements being used against them in subsequent legal
actions. The President is expected to announce other initiatives to facilitate
national preparedness, including a Department of Labor job bank for Y2K workers.

_____
From:
ITAA's Year 2000 Outlook (email)