SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : ProNetLink..(PNLK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: john mock who wrote (7694)7/11/1998 1:02:00 PM
From: Paganini  Respond to of 8242
 
John! John! John!,

I can see you have no IT (Information Tech) experience. It took the company I work for 1 year after the release of NT4.0 (its an operating system John) to migrate to that platform. And even after a year I think they are up to patch (it means fix John)3 or 4. The only way they got to patch (fix) 3 or 4 is by releasing the product to the field (thats the real world John)and seeing where the problems occur. Then people call in with complaints, the company creates patches (fixes) that correct the problem. I think Lotus Notes (they make e-mail systems John) is up to patch (fix) hold on there John let me check what version we are into (be right back)(ok I'm back. We are into version 4.5.2, and I'm almost sure there is more to come. This is what I'm talking about when I say facts John. There is alot that has to go into the making of a site this complex. Don't take this wrong John but you sound alittle P!$$@*. If you have something constructive to add John by all means do so. I don't think anybody here has any problem with that. Its my understanding PNL has done bout everything they were expected to do. And for those who understand what it takes to put together a site like this I don't think they mind any minor delays.



To: john mock who wrote (7694)7/11/1998 3:13:00 PM
From: David Cal  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 8242
 
Let give PNLK time to settle down and fixed all the required items before announcing Phase 2 is completed. As a shareholder of PNLK, I rather see the co. do a good job in completing their tasks, and declared a "success".

As Glenn said before, you can't keep EVERYONE happy. You give them one inch and they ask for one yard. The good things are that the website is REVOLVED around members' suggestions, and a good management team who is willing to listen.

After a thorough DD on PNLK, I will stick with PNLK for long term. If you're here hoping for a "quick" hit-and-run profit, you better look elsewhere. If you don't like what you see, SELL PNLK and move on. I'm tired of you WHINERS.

Long on PNLK




To: john mock who wrote (7694)7/11/1998 6:37:00 PM
From: Pete Summers  Respond to of 8242
 
I, do not think its fair of you to pronounce this company a failure because of a delay. I would rather make sure that everything on site is fully functional, than prematurely launch marketing. I, believe in the concept behind PNLK, and believe it has extreme potential. If there is a delay I think it is only fair to let the company respond and go from there. I bought PNLK for what they could do in the next decade, not the next quarter. Good Luck, Pete