Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : WINSPEAR FACTS-NOT HYPE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. Charters who wrote (124)	7/12/1998 2:49:00 AM
From: Tomato	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 135

Eric, Looks like if you go S by SE from the boulders you end up around Haywood Lake, which, if the map I have is accurate, is partially on SUF staked pty. What a hoot if the "source" is on SUF pty. MPV is just to the east of SUF, I think. Is there any reason why WSP can't release detailed maps showing where the dyke outcrops so investors can calculate how much of the dyke/fissure/sill/whatever is on land? What would happen if an exploration company such as WSP put all their cards on the table instead of playing cute with us dumb schmucks who supposedly, to paraphrase Ross Perot, own the company? If people still distrust WSP mgt. (I know that I for one, do), it's because they do crappy stuff like reprice options and commit sins of omission by not revealing to SH what they've got. They won't tell us the colored diamond count. Why not? You hear some theory about hiding colored diamond info. from DeBeers. I don't get it. I could see if they didn't have land rights to the pty. why they'd have to be playing it close to the vest, but since they own the rights to the pty, I don't get it. I've been calling IRs of mining companies for several years and all I get is bullshit, with the one exception of Atna and Peter DeLancy, their CEO, who used to do the IR himself. (Their official IR is a good guy, too)