Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : E-Prime Aerospace (EPEA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: starman who wrote (232)	7/11/1998 3:46:00 PM
From: John Liu	Respond to of 680

Don't know much about missles but my guess might be that peacemaker and another russian missle were build/designed to carry nuclear weapons where as others were not. I guess at the time the start treaty was being signed those two(and russian counterpart) were the main missles being used. Just a guess, am I right? John

To: starman who wrote (232)	7/11/1998 3:51:00 PM
From: Richard	Respond to of 680

Hi Starman, I agree with you that it does not seem right that EPEA should be held up while others are launching, but the one thorn in EPEA's side, is that the Peacekeeper was very detailed as one of the rockets[missiles]in the "Start" Treaty between Russia and the US. The main reason is that the Peacekeeper is one of the most steerable rockets in the world. Yes I agree the clock is ticking away, but as of late EPEA would be able to launch at a lower price than anyone else in the World, including China. EPEA Believer*Richard