Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bill Wexler's Profits of DOOM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: S Shaw who wrote (1421)	7/11/1998 5:39:00 PM
From: Y2k_fan	Respond to of 4634

Thanks for your response. My understanding is, the judge stop short of enjoining Aquarius because CDN did not file some direction evidences. For some reasons, this has been delaying for quite a while. It could be that CDN wanted to use "indirect copying" to enjoin Aquarius because that would be easier to prove and broader to expand. However, the judge asked for more direct evidence like "substantial similarity," which will take more time & effort to prove. Because AVNT can hire some other experts to argue the validity. Anyway, AVNT's future is still clouded, and I think that this does give a very bad example. It's just like so many penny stock scams out there and will never be caught with justice, IMHO.