SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Zonagen (zona) - good buy? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brander who wrote (4789)7/12/1998 1:28:00 AM
From: Bill Wexler  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7041
 
<<I have never had a position in ZONA>>

Interesting that you would also post on the TXB thread.

Why the "interest" in these two companies?



To: Brander who wrote (4789)7/12/1998 1:44:00 AM
From: Bill Wexler  Respond to of 7041
 
<<you are not qualified to interpret them>>

Spare me.

I ask again about your interest in TXB. You and Clueless (Dauntless) were active posters on that board. You both criticized my posts detailing the company shady past with stock promoters. I recommended shorting the stock and I turned out to be correct. I correctly predicted that Novastan would be rejected. I figure I was very qualified to interpret THOSE results "doctor".

I am not surprised that you and clueless would be shilling for TXB and ZONA simultaneously. I have pointed out on many occassions the links between the two companies, in terms of board members, investors, and the odd way they conduct "research and development". Both companies are located in the biotech fraud hotbed of Houston Texas.

Pfizer spent over a half-billion dollars to develop Viagra. Zonagen merely took an old generic vasodilator and is trying to con the investement community that they have an ED medication.

Zonagen is a fraud and a scam, and Joe Podolski is a filthy, lying crook.



To: Brander who wrote (4789)7/12/1998 11:38:00 AM
From: Linda Kaplan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7041
 
Is it your opinion that an MD degree is a required qualification for interpreting scientific data?

Linda