Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : American International Industries Inc. OTC BB Symbol EDII -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: T. Hamilton who wrote (405)	7/12/1998 5:24:00 AM
From: marcos	Respond to of 4814

I didn't post here last night until you showed up trying to justify your good buddy's attack on Janice, pal. No amount of your weasel words will turn that act into anything but the reprehensible morally repugnant cowardly act of a hypester bully that it is. Along with a bright red flag on the stock. What kind of paper needs that sort of modus operandi to sell it?

To: T. Hamilton who wrote (405)	7/12/1998 5:28:00 AM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4814

Ken M. is not a cop in San Antonio? Then he must have lied in his profile; "Name Ken M. Member Since Jun 03, 1998 Company San Antonio Police Dept. Occupation\Title Sr. Patrolman Age 34 Location Southwest College UTSA, Southwest Degree 3 Yrs, no major" 207.183.153.73

To: T. Hamilton who wrote (405)	7/12/1998 5:56:00 AM
From: marcos	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4814

Verbosity and rambling conspiracy theories and threats won't cut it, T. Hamilton. The beauty and the horror of SI is that every word you post here is dated and archived, accessible to all other members. You leave a record, so consider before hitting the Submit button what sort of record you wish to leave. It's sort of like the record companies leave, when the shareholders over time compare their promises with their performance. Speaking of which, I hear there were financials out on this EDII, but they were retracted or withdrawn or invalid or something? How can that be, do you know what happened there? Oh, and do you know anything about this Joe Gort person #reply-4816465 His name is at the bottom of this edii release biz.yahoo.com

To: T. Hamilton who wrote (405)	7/12/1998 7:55:00 AM
From: ColleenB	Respond to of 4814

Mr. Hamilton, I am so very glad that you showed up. I was wondering if you could advise me on an issue...free of charge ...<g> I have been deeply distressed these past few days, finding it difficult to eat properly or sleep through the nights, to name but a few .....seems that normal personal habits have been greatly altered since I was called (along with a few others) a low life by JMT. What I gather, from reading your postings, I may have grounds for sending JMT to the corner for a while....do I understand correctly? thank you, sleepless, sleepless colleen PS....you could PM on this issue

To: T. Hamilton who wrote (405)	7/12/1998 8:35:00 AM
From: ColleenB	Respond to of 4814

Mr. Hamilton, Don't know if you've seen this post, but thought it might be of some interest to you... canoe.ca

To: T. Hamilton who wrote (405)	7/12/1998 8:45:00 AM
From: jmt	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4814

>>>>I would like to point out, that judging from Ken M's past post, he does not strike me as an evil person, <<< This statement says volumes. You have clearly not read any of Ken M's posts. He is cruel, vendictive and disgusting. So why would you put forth such an effort to defend him? And to suddenly appear now on this thread. We have already determined the connection between Gort, Gutman, Growth International, Mitchell Vince and Ken M. Thank you for your myopic legal opinion. Why work for a prestigious law firm when you can get this job? jmt

To: T. Hamilton who wrote (405)	7/12/1998 10:15:00 AM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4814

Another question comes to mind, how can anyone be sure that that was indeed Ms. shell's home address and phone number, maybe it was Ms. Shell, and friends with SI, to have a way in which to silence Ms. Shells biggest adversary. Welcome to Fantasyland. NOW who's flinging about highly irresponsible statements? Actually, quite a number of SI friends know it's my home address, because we've corresponded. And sorry, I scarcely consider Ken M. my "biggest adversary". I consider him a rude person--go back and look at some of his earlier posts to me--who is uninterested in, and perhaps incapabable of, properly evaluating false "information". Another question maybe it was Ms Shell herself who sent Ken m the PM, using a different name(like she did a week ago when she went and signed up for a 30 day free trial, then came on EDII's thread with an alias close to her same in which she posted a sarcastic remark about "Yea go to the moon EDII") Uh-oh. I thought lawyers weren't supposed to leap to conclusions for which there's no foundation. The emphasized statement is indeed a lie. I signed up for no 30-day trial. That account, by the way, was closed, and the messages deleted. ...and then fed Mr. Ken M this info on the illegal manipulaation going on there, and knowing how he would react to this info, suckered him in to doing something that SI could interpet as violation of there terms of service, and be able to kick of several of the ones, who apparently did most of the positive DD on EDII, something to think about, and after seeing Ms. Shell and SI in action, I wouldn't put it past them to do something like this. I'm sorry. I'm an adult. I don't feel the need to do this stuff.

To: T. Hamilton who wrote (405)	7/12/1998 10:42:00 AM
From: Mr. Forthright	Respond to of 4814

How can you be defending this guy's actions?

To: T. Hamilton who wrote (405)	7/12/1998 12:13:00 PM
From: CatLady	Respond to of 4814

"Another question comes to mind, how can anyone be sure that that was indeed Ms. shell's home address and phone number, maybe it was Ms. Shell, and friends with SI, to have a way in which to silence Ms. Shells biggest adversary. Another question maybe it was Ms Shell herself who sent Ken m the PM, using a different name( like she did a week ago when she went and signed up for a 30 day free trial, then came on EDII's thread with an alias close to her same in which she posted a sarcastic remark about "Yea go to the moon EDII"), and then fed Mr. Ken M this info on the illegal manipulaation going on there, and knowing how he would react to this info, suckered him in to doing something that SI could interpet as violation of there terms of service, and be able to kick of several of the ones, who apparently did most of the positive DD on EDII, something to think about, and after seeing Ms. Shell and SI in action, I wouldn't put it past them to do something like this. " And maybe you are Ken M, back on SI with another alias to defend your own "honor"? Are you Ken?