Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ben & Ally Maddox who wrote (33351)	7/12/1998 11:46:00 AM
From: Paunch	Respond to of 35569

Ben and Ally I think you are right on target, the last thing we would want to do is to hurt IPM in any way, they have enough problems without any one causing more. My concern at this time is the fact that no one can get IPM to report what is happening and learning that we could be trading again if IPM dropped the appeal with NASDAQ. I understand that IPM believes that they will not have the money necessary to fight the appeal,so I for one think it would be better to drop the appeal and start trading again, who knows by returning to the market , the price of IPM might rise enough to allow IPM to be able to get the financing they need to survive. Just a thought on my part. Keep up the good work I back the law suit against the Arizona Department of Mines and Mason Coggons 110 % Its about time someone made the guilty pay.