SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : KERM'S KORNER -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kerm Yerman who wrote (11706)7/13/1998 1:57:00 AM
From: Kerm Yerman  Respond to of 15196
 
MARKET ACTIVITY/ WEEKEND EDITION OF TRADING NOTES JULY 12, 1998 (6)

INVESTING

Amoco Raised To Buy


J.P. Morgan Securities said Thursday analyst Jay Wilson raised his rating on Amoco Corp to buy from market performer.

-- Raised target price to $51 a share from $45.

-- In a note, said improvements in business fundamentals such as improved returns in refining and marketing business, increasing chemical volumes and improving cost structure, are closer at hand.

-- Said Amoco is one of the least sensitive of the oil companies to changes in crude oil prices. Also cited Amoco's high liquidity and 3.6 percent dividend yield as positives.

Gordon Upgrades Renaissance Energy To Hold

Renaissance Energy Ltd.
(RES-T: $22.90) HOLD

With the acquisition of Pinnacle Resources completed, we are upgrading our recommendation on Renaissance from a Sell to a Hold.

While the merits of this transaction are less obvious in the current oil price environment, we believe the up side potential of the acquired assets are substantial in both reserves and productions
increases.

Currently, we are forecasting production of 94,000 bbls/d of liquids and 530 mmcf/d of gas in 1998. In 1999, we are forecasting production of 115,000 bbls/d of liquids and 630 mmcf/d the bulk of the year over year increase results from the inclusion of the Pinnacle production for a full year.

Our fully diluted CFPS forecast is $3.05 in 1998 and $3.75 in 1999. These estimates assume a WTI price of US$15.50/bbl in 1998 and US$ 17.00/bbl in 1999 and a gas price forecast of C$1.90 /mcf in 1998 and C$2.00/mcf in 1999.

Debt currently stands at approximately 1.3 billion, this is 3.3X 1998 cash flow and 2.4X 1999 cash flow. Our 12-month target for Renaissance is $25.00. HOLD

Dollar Falls, Spirits Up
Depressed loonie aids export economy

Calgary Herald

The depressed dollar sank to record lows Friday, raising some corporate spirits in Calgary and Banff, but it dragged down travellers' enthusiasm for U.S. holidays.

Counter to trends across much of the rest of Canada, Calgary thrives on a predominantly export economy. That means it sells a major chunk of its products for U.S. greenbacks.

And when the Canadian dollar goes down in comparison to the U.S. dollar, it means money in the bank.

The oilpatch, for example, sells half of its oil and natural-gas production to U.S. buyers. Oil closed Friday at $13.87 US, which translates into $20.77 Cdn after Friday's decline.

"It's fabulous news for us," Bryan Bates of BW Technologies Ltd., said after the loonie sank to a 135-year low against its U.S. counterpart, falling 0.15 cents to 67.63.

"We make dramatically better (profit) margins," Bates said.

BW manufactures safety equipment for hazardous gases. It sells 70 per cent of its high-tech products on the international market where the U.S. dollar is the currency of record.

Most of its costs are in 100-cent Canadian dollars, but a big chunk of its income is in 149-cent U.S. dollars.

It's much the same story in the bull-semen business.

"Several years ago, we chose to do all of our international selling in U.S. dollars, so every time the Canadian dollar goes down we increase our profit," said Doug Blair, president of Alta Genetics Inc.

But Alta Genetics had to slice the price for its product in Europe, because those currencies, like Canada's dollar, have failed to keep pace with the surging U.S. dollar.

"If you look at the Canadian dollar against, say, the Dutch guilder, it really has stayed pretty steady."

The Calgary Economic Development Authority lists about 1,000 exporters in the city. To some extent, all of those companies benefit from the current exchange rate.

Analysts cited June's unemployment statistics across Canada for the dollar's drop. The rate was unchanged at 8.4 per cent, but Statistics Canada said there were 36,000 fewer jobs across the country. Calgary stood virtually unchanged at five per cent -- tied with Regina for the lowest unemployment.

Money traders cited the national figures as evidence Canada's strong economy may be weakening.

"There is nothing over the near-term that suggests there's going to be a significant rebound in the Canadian dollar," said Rob Palombi, an economist with Standard and Poor's MMS in Toronto.

"Overall, the economic fundamentals are still broadly supportive for the currency, but there's too much uncertainty still hanging over the Asian market, and that is really the driving force."

Asia's economic woes are also blamed for decade-low crude-oil prices in the past month.

"It's a nice bonus on any oil or gas you have contracted to sell for U.S. dollars," Art Eastly, president of Canadian Forest Oil Ltd., said of the low Canadian dollar. He has the added edge of producing a lot of gas and selling it to U.S. customers.

But as the summer holiday-travel season unfolds, the sinking loonie means the U.S. continues to be less attractive for Canadians, and with such historic news, one would think Americans would flock northward in unprecedented droves.

Well -- yes and no.

Debra Ward, president of Tourism Industry of Canada (TIAC) said: "I hate to say it, but Americans don't seem to care a rat's 'batutu' about the Canadian dollar. When they get here, they're pleasantly surprised, but it's the destination that ultimately sells."

Banff is a case in point.

Bracing themselves for a radical drop in the lucrative Japanese market, hotels in this alpine town report 90 to 95 per cent occupancy rates, not appreciably different from last summer.

The Banff Springs Hotels' summer traffic has shifted, but only slightly. Last summer, 55 per cent of its 770 rooms were booked by Japanese tourists; this year it's 50 per cent. That five-per-cent dent has been filled by Americans who've moved from being 25 per cent of its guest base to 30 per cent, said Ted Kisane, GM of the CP jewel. "But it's definitely a market that we're going to grow over the next five years."

The word on Banff's clogged streets is that, overall, there's likely been a 15-per-cent drop in Japanese tourists, but licence plates tell the rest of that story. Parking lots are full of vehicles from other provinces and the United States.

Meanwhile, rubber-tire traffic to the States has dropped 40 per cent since 1991 (the year cross-border shopping peaked), according to Statistics Canada's latest survey. Canada Customs reports a slight drop in border crossings from Alberta to Montana in the past year. The 583,164 crossings in the year ending March 31 are down 1,500 from the 1996-97 figures.

Air traffic to the U.S. has fallen 10 per cent during the first quarter of this year. During the same time last year, domestic travel was up five per cent.

"Given what's happened to our dollar since May, we expect these trends to continue through the summer, with more dramatic findings in the fall," said Gerald Bailie, senior research analyst with the Canadian Tourism Commission.

The record low dollar won't hurt Montana and Idaho that much -- the hit was taken years ago, say a number of Americans.

However, even with the dollar at its lowest level ever, some Americans are seeing more Canadian visitors.

"Most of the damage was done years ago," said Randy Gayner of Glacier Wilderness Guides at Glacier National Park. "Canadians were shocked at the big decrease. They seem to be slowly getting used to it, and our numbers are slowly creeping up."

In Idaho, the Silverwood Theme Park offers a 25-per-cent exchange rate, Anthony Clark said. The 125-site park gets a lot of snowbirds and one-day visits to its amusement park. "We're still down from 10 years ago, but bottomed out two years ago and are on our way back up."

TIAC's Ward says Canadians make concessions. Rather than bunk down in a Hilton, they'll stay at a Super 8. That 10 day trip to Yellowstone is contained to a week. As for shopping, well, they scratch that from their list.

Earnings, Asia Test Street's Hunger For Gains
By Aaron Task for Investor and MSNBC

Depending on your appetite, developments in Japan will either be Wall Street's main course next week or merely a sidedish on the buffet of U.S. corporate earnings. Whether Japan is an appetizer or entr‚e will largely depend on the upper house elections Sunday.

The recipe is simple: If Prime Minister Ryutaro Hashimoto's LDP party manages to maintain or add to its current 61 seats in the upper Diet, "the story of tax cuts and banking reform is back on," according to Michael Scarlatos, international economist at Bankers Trust. Should the LDP lose ground in the elections, it could be construed as a no-confidence vote for Hashimoto, clearly damaging the reforms he is trying to implement and perhaps, eventually, costing him his job, Scarlatos said.

"The fear is if [Hashimoto] comes out in trouble, then he's much more emasculated in trying to take advantage of the so-called window of opportunity and may not be able to turn around the banking or tax issue," the economist said. "It's pretty important."

The importance of the weekend is underscored by unconfirmed rumors that U.S. Treasury banking officials have flown to Japan ahead of the elections. Some market players speculate that the trip means the U.S. fears Hashimoto's days are numbered, and want to be on the ground floor to stem the damage.

Scarlatos declined to comment on the rumors, but does expect Hashimoto's government to emerge intact after the weekend in what he described as a "typical status-quo victory by the Japanese electorate."

Why all this matters to Wall Street goes back to Japan's position as the world's second-largest economy and the linchpin of a recovery in Asia. Should Hashimoto's party falter, the prospect for reform in Japan would be clouded, and the yen likely would fall further vs. the dollar. A weaker yen increases the possibility of a Chinese devaluation of their currency, and another round of "competitive" devaluations by other Asian nations. That, of course, means a stronger dollar, which makes it that much more difficult for U.S. corporations operating in international markets to generate earnings growth. And U.S. based manufacturers will be forced to compete with even lower-priced imports from Asia.

In other words, trouble for Hashimoto is good news for U.S. consumers -- but bad news for the stock market.

Developments in Russia, for whom the International Monetary Fund is contemplating aid of up to $15 billion, will also affect financial markets worldwide. But if Japan offers no negative surprises, Wall Street will turn its focus to U.S. corporate earnings.

A battery of reports are due next week, including several from tech stalwarts: Intel (INTC) on Tuesday, Compaq Computer (CPQ) on Wednesday and Microsoft (MSFT) on Thursday. Investors will be paying close attention to what all three tech giants have to say, not only about second quarter results but prospects for the second half of 1998 and beyond.

On Friday, Compaq closed up 3/16 to 31 3/4; Intel (INTC) finished unchanged at 79 3/4 but rose about 10% for the week; and Microsoft (MSFT) gained 2 3/16 to 113.

Other tech names due to report next week include Ascend Communications (ASND), Seagate Technology (SEG), Novellus Systems (NVLS) and EarthLink Networks (ELNK).

A bevy of Dow members and blue chips are also slated to report, including the big three U.S. auto makers, NationsBank (NB), International Paper (IP), Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), J.P. Morgan (JPM), BankAmerica (BAC), Caterpillar (CAT), Eastman Kodak (EK), Diamond Offshore (DO), Goodyear Tire & Rubber (GT), Gillette (G), Georgia-Pacific (GP) and Coca-Cola (KO). For a more complete list, please check the earnings calendar.

Given all the positive outcomes -- the Nasdaq hit three straight record closes to end this week, the S&P 500 added onto its recent string of new standards, while the Dow closed within 40 points of its all-time high Wednesday -- you'd think traders would be more effusive. But records and near-records for major indexes aside, a growing number of players are cautious about the prospect for further gains of any substance in the days and weeks ahead.

Some market watchers expect stocks to rally as second-quarter earnings prove not as woeful as once feared, but "I'm not so sure," says Rao Chalasani, chief investment strategist at Everen Securities. "The analysts have been guided to take the numbers down and companies may beat it. It looks good for that day, but you're still seeing declining earnings growth year-over-year. If you're talking about a rally coming, you're talking for a week or two, not for the next three or four months."

Furthermore, the positive influence of lower bond rates has probably run its course, unless the Fed adopts an easing bias or an economic recession looms as a concern, the strategist said, arguing that neither is a legitimate near term possibility.

That said, Chalasani does not recommend investors exit the stock market, which he believes will remain in a tight range, constrained on the upside by slowing earnings but prevented from a big decline by strong liquidity.

"We're basically telling people to be selective," he said. "You want to make sure you're not in a stock with the potential for disappointment and then a 20% shaving."

The strategist currently prefers consumer cyclicals like Wal-Mart (WMT), Sears (S) and the lesser known 99 Cents Only Stores (NDN); big-cap pharmaceuticals like American Home Products (AHP) and Pfizer (PFE); as well as telecom plays like Qualcomm (QCOM).

We can't speak for the stocks mentioned above, but avoiding the disappointments does seem like solid advice.




To: Kerm Yerman who wrote (11706)7/13/1998 2:25:00 AM
From: Kerm Yerman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15196
 
MARKET ACTIVITY/ WEEKEND EDITION OF TRADING NOTES JULY 12, 1998 (7)

INVESTING, Con't

Take A Walk On The Dark Side

The current market's love affair with momentum stocks means value investors need to tweak their strategy.
Here's how.

By Jim Jubak - Jubak's Journal
Microsoft Investor

Value investors haven't done particularly well this year. The official numbers capture some of the damage. For example, the Russell 3000 Value Index has lagged its sibling Growth Index by slightly more than 30% in 1998.

But my guess is that most investors who try to follow a value strategy have actually done much worse than the index's 13.6% return. A strategy of buying beaten-up stocks that are trading at a discount to their peers or to their own fundamental value would have stocked a portfolio with great bargains -- Oracle Corp. (ORCL), Oxford Health Plans Inc. (OXHP), Rowan Companies Inc. (RDC), 3Com Corp. (COMS), to name just a few. But these bargains haven't produced much in the way of gains. The best, Oracle, has returned just 3.4% in 1998; the worst, Rowan Companies, shows a 37% loss this year.

I think I know where some of these value plays have gone wrong -- including my decisions not only to hold onto an oil drilling and service stock like Rowan Companies in Jubak's Picks, but to add to my industry exposure by buying Diamond Offshore Drilling (DO) because it was cheap. I think many value investors have backed the wrong stocks because they have underestimated this market's reluctance to recognize value when it comes in a tattered package. Let me try to explain why. Then I'll sketch in a value strategy modified to fit this market. And I'll end with a pick -- Schlumberger Ltd. (SLB) -- and two drops -- Rowan Companies and Diamond Offshore -- from Jubak's Picks.

What have value investors misunderstood about this market? I think we've paid too much attention to the great numbers being turned in by a relatively small number of stocks. We've been investing as if this is a healthy market that will lift all boats. Maybe because we know this market is extremely expensive -- and because we see tremendous returns going to investors in the most expensive stocks -- we've concentrated on buying stocks after big tumbles in price. Without noticing, we've redefined value investing as a strategy of buying former high fliers after they've crashed. And we've actually been most attracted to the stocks that have been crushed most in price.

That would be fine, except that this isn't a healthy, lift-all-boats market. It's actually two very different markets.

First, there's the momentum market -- the one I wrote about in my last column, "Long live momentum." That's the market where Yahoo! (YHOO) climbs $26 a share in a single day, Amazon.com (AMZN) tacks on $15, and even such stodgy big caps as Lucent Technologies (LU) and Home Depot Inc. (HD) pop almost $4 a share to hit yet another new 52-week high.

Then, there's the other market -- the one that's going nowhere or worse. On the same day (July 6) that saw Yahoo!, Amazon.com, Lucent, and Home Depot dish up those lovely gains, 2,086 of the stocks traded on the Nasdaq market went down. Only 2,062 went up. The truth is that since the beginning of the year, while the 30 stocks in the Dow Industrials were climbing almost 15% and while the 500 stocks in the Standard & Poor's 500 were gaining 19%, 4,080 of the stocks in Investor's database have shown a loss (while 4,370 show a positive return of any size). Despite the headlines, last quarter was actually even worse for the average stock; 5,633 stocks in our database showed a loss while just 2,967 pushed into positive territory.

In my last column, I laid out what this means for stocks in the first part of the market. These stocks were expensive three months ago and will most likely get more expensive as money chases the amazing recent returns from a handful of equities.

But in the second part of the market, the situation adds up to benign neglect. Bargains are intriguing in principle, but investors who are worried about future earnings growth and who can't see an end to the mess in Asia have very little reason to invest outside the narrow list of names racking up gains in the momentum market. Value stocks will have to show investors a few quarters of real earnings improvement in order to attract the attention that translates into the kind of money flows that move stocks.

To some degree, of course, that's the way value investing has always worked. The best value investors always get in before the rest of the world sees a turnaround and then wait for everyone else to see what they have seen.

But I think the general earnings slowdown and the difficulty in predicting the bottom in Asia make the traditional lag in value investing excruciatingly long right now. Buying Oracle because you believe in the company's turnaround story and waiting six months before the stock moves up is called "Getting in early." Waiting a year starts to feel painful. Waiting eighteen months without some positive feedback (commonly called profit) from the general market is more than most of us can stand.

That kind of delay is certainly conceivable right now. Morgan Stanley's economists are now saying that the Japanese economy will bottom no earlier than the March quarter of 1999. Some semiconductor equipment companies are starting to wonder if the turnaround in their industry will come in 2000 and not in 1999.

In this kind of market, with this kind of uncertainty, I think you should revise your definition of a bargain. I think value investors still should look for stocks that have gone down, but I think they should look for stocks that have gone down less than their peers in an industry. That smaller-than-average decline could be a signal that this company will bounce back more quickly than its peers -- that it may actually lead its industry upward -- and that the company might be taking steps that will improve its competitive position in its industry.

As I laid out in my column, "Ten tech stocks to buy . later," I think the likely extreme length of the down cycle in the semiconductor equipment industry makes it too early to invest in Applied Materials (AMAT). I'd wait at least six months -- even though the company is the prototype of the kind of value I'm talking about. At every downturn in the very cyclical semiconductor equipment industry, Applied Materials makes key acquisitions of smaller, cash-strapped equipment makers in order to expand its product line. The company continues to invest heavily in research and development during these tough times, so that competitors who entered the down cycle with a sizable technology lead find themselves suddenly behind Applied Materials when good times return.

So how do you go about finding companies like this? First of all, forget about screening on biggest price declines or lowest price-to-sales ratios. All these exercises will do is turn up the cheapest -- but most troubled -- stocks in an industry. Instead, you want to start by casting a very loose net, then compare the stocks this captures with the performance of their industry peers.

My screen actually has only one real requirement: I look for stocks that fell in price in the last quarter. (You can vary the time period -- and, in fact, I encourage you to run this same exercise for both six months and a year as well. Doing all three will catch stocks that would otherwise escape because they're poor performance doesn't precisely fit a single time period.) I also require that a stock has a market capitalization of $12 billion or more, but that's simply to get the sample down to a size that Investor can handle. You can run the same screen with a low market capitalization -- say, below $2 billion to pick up just small-cap stocks. (Investor subscribers can click the link to the left to see the full list of stocks in the Investment Finder.)

Every other factor in the screen is requested as "display only." That means I get to see the data, but it doesn't effect the selection of the sample. "Display only" factors include industry name, price to book value (a standard value measure that compares a stock's price per share to the value per share of a company's assets), industry average price-to-book value, price-to-sales ratio (which compares the price of a share of stock to the company's sales per share), and industry average price-to-sales ratio.

Once I've built this screen I save it and then create a modified version to use in comparing each company with its industry peers. (To do that, I change the requirement for a decline in stock price in the quarter into a "display only" for the quarter's stock price and substitute the appropriate industry for the market-cap criterion.)

I suggest you start your study of a list like this either with a cluster of companies in the same industry or with an industry that you know from experience might offer good hunting for value stocks. For example, I've spent so much time in the trenches with the oil and gas equipment and services industry -- most of it knee-deep in red ink -- that I started my work with Schlumberger. (Investor subscribers can click the link to the left to see the full list of stocks in the Investment Finder.)

Schlumberger is clearly a relative-value stock. Its 8.8% price decline in the last quarter is well below the 85% decline of the worst performer in the group, Concord Energy (CODE). Schlumberger's price to sales and price to book ratios are also well above the average.

But all that really means is that this stock has held up in price during a period that has crushed its peers. Now I want to find out if that relative out-performance is justified and whether the stock might actually be cheap given its quality.

Looking at Schlumberger's business, the relative outperformance seems reasonable. This is a highly diversified company -- much more so than most of its peers -- so revenue should hold up better in the down market for the oil industry. Part of the company's product line -- its electronic systems for extending the life of oil and gas fields -- is high-margin, high-tech gear. And like an oil and gas equipment clone of Applied Materials, Schlumberger has been building an impressive record of deals in the tough times that began last year. This year's deal to acquire Camco International gives the company even more market share and advances it toward its goal of being a one-stop shop for oil equipment and services.

Is the stock a value at its current price? It is well down from its high, and the price-to-book and price-to-sales ratios are certainly below the 10-year highs of last December. It is certainly not priced at the kind of rock-bottom levels you'll see at the darkest point in an oil industry cycle.

If you believe, as I do, that the boom in oil drilling will resume once Asia starts to soak up some of the world's extra supply of oil, then the stock seems very reasonably priced. With Schlumberger, I'll be waiting for that turnaround in the best company in the industry, one that should come out of this pause even stronger than it went in. That makes the stock a good value to me.

I'm adding Schlumberger to Jubak's Picks -- and at the same time dropping Rowan Companies and Diamond Offshore. I think those two companies are very good pure plays on the upside of the oil-industry cycle. I think once investors are convinced that the cycle has turned, they should move up even faster than Schlumberger. But if Schlumberger works as I hope it will, it should move up before these smaller stocks, giving me both an earlier profit and early warning to jump back into the sector.

And, if worse comes to worst and this down cycle for oil lasts longer than I think, I've moved into the financially strongest company in the sector, the one best positioned to take advantage of its peers' problems. Call it value investing with a long-term safety net.

New Developments on Past Columns

Ten tech stocks to buy . later

Wall Street can't make up its mind about Applied Materials (AMAT). On July 6, Salomon Smith Barney put the stock on its list of exceptional stocks for the rest of 1998. Two days later, BT Alex. Brown offered a very different opinion. The firm trimmed FY 1998 earnings estimates to $1.16 a share from $1.36 a share, and hacked its FY 1999 earnings estimate to 97 cents a share from $1.54 a share. That puts BT Alex. Brown about 20 cents below the consensus earnings estimate of $1.35 for Applied Materials' fiscal 1998 year that ends in October, and a whopping 64 cents a share below the consensus estimate for 1999. I'll put my money on the BT Alex. Brown view -- especially since it confirms the June cut to $1 for FY 1999 by Morgan Stanley. I think the consensus earnings estimates still have a long way to fall for Applied Materials, and so it's way too early to look for a bottom in the stock.

Other stocks on the Salomon Smith Barney "exceptional stocks" list, by the way, were Alcatel (ALA), Allstate Corp. (ALL), Amgen Inc. (AMGN), Black & Decker Corp. (BDK), Chase Manhattan Corp. (CMB), Honeywell Inc. (HON), IBM Corp. (IBM), Motorola Inc. (MOT), Navistar Corp. (NAV), Schlumberger Ltd. (SLB), Schering-Plough Corp. (SGP), Williams Companies (WMB), Wal-Mart Stores (WMT) and Xerox Corp. (XRX).

Changes to Jubak's Picks

Add Schlumberger

I'm adding Schlumberger (SLB) to Jubak's Picks with a July 1999 price target of $85. I like the stock's combination of modest risk and solid upside. Shares of the international oil and gas equipment and service company are trading about $25 a share off the 52-week high of $94. And the company's diversification into telecommunications, metering and test equipment, and electronic smart cards makes the shares less sensitive to oil prices than most companies in its industry. On the upside, I like Schlumberger's positioning at the high-tech end of the oil service business. Its cutting-edge electronic systems for detecting and monitoring oil flows allow an oil producer to get up to 50% more oil from an existing field. The company's international exposure -- about 75% of business is outside the U.S. -- and its ability to offer everything from seismic detection to enhanced oil-recovery technology should make the shares among the first to move upwards when oil prices begin to recover.

Drop Diamond Offshore Drilling

Cheap hasn't been enough. I bought Diamond Offshore (DO) at $46 and change on February 27, 1998, when the stock was already $20 a share off its 52-week high. Since then (through July 8) shares of this owner of the world's largest fleet of semi-submersible drilling rigs have fallen another $8, or about 16%. That's not a bad performance relative to the rest of the drilling industry -- which has been pounded as the price of oil plummeted. Stocks of companies that specialize in deepwater drilling did hold up better than stocks of less specialized service companies. But relative performance doesn't put dollars in my pocket. I don't see a sustained turnaround in oil equipment and service stocks until a recovery in Asia starts the price of oil moving upward again. Even when that happens, I think more liquid stocks such as Schlumberger will move up first. So I'm selling Diamond Offshore from Jubak's Picks.

Drop Rowan Companies

What can I say? I bought Rowan Companies (RDC) on Oct. 21, 1997 at $41 a share on momentum in the oil equipment and service sector. Since then, I've had momentum all right -- all downward. The Asian economic crisis and the world oversupply of oil cut the legs out from underneath world oil prices and that eventually sent the stocks of the companies that supply the oil producers down, down, down. I should have sold sooner instead of fighting the logic of falling oil prices. My loss in this position was about 52% as of July 8. I've had enoug

Day Traders Emerge As Market Forces
Globe & Mail

Investing for the long term is the mantra of the value investor. Hang in for five or 10 years, as Warren Buffett does, and you will retire in style. But defining "long term" is a highly subjective exercise. For a peculiar species of investor known as the day trader, long term is an hour and owning shares for a few minutes is routine.

Day traders are investors only in the broadest sense of the term. Using ultrafast electronic trading systems, they dart in and out of stocks and rarely hold a position overnight. None of the traditional measures of analysis and value is used and, in some cases, the people in front of the screen do not even know the business of the company they are buying or selling. All they care about is momentum. If a stock is moving up, they pile in, earn a few cents a share and bail out in droves the instant the tide turns. Do that enough times a day and you can make (or lose) a small fortune.

The advent of the day trader helps to explain the increasing volatility of the stock market in general and certain stocks in particular. If a stock that shows every sign of being kind to you suddenly plunges for no apparent reason, there is a good chance the day traders can be blamed. Their lightning-quick arrival and departure tends to exaggerate a stock's "normal" trajectory. This is why they are considered evil by traditional investors; to them, day traders are nothing more than quick-buck artists bent on whipping the market into a froth and turning everyone into nervous wrecks.

Day traders are quick to defend themselves. They argue they do everyone a favour by adding liquidity to the market and narrowing the spread, the difference between a stock's bid and ask price. In the past year, the typical spread on a Nasdaq stock has narrowed by about 30 per cent, meaning both buyers and sellers are getting better deals.

Day traders have been around for years but two factors -- technology and the raging bull market -- have turned them into market forces. Experts think this new army of traders can account for as much as 20 per cent of the trading volume on Nasdaq, their favourite hunting ground.

Advances in trading technology have given them the ability to trade more quickly than the top houses on Wall Street. A day trader at a small firm in New York says the relatively cheap software he uses allows him to flip a stock faster than mighty Fidelity Investments, his former employer, which spends hundreds of millions a year on technology.

Day trading is not limited to the professional day-trading shops, such as New York's Schonfeld Securities. Anyone with the stomach to put their own money on the line can play the game. Small U.S. brokerages, such as Broadway Trading, offer an easy route in. Broadway supplies wannabe traders with a trading room and the hardware and software required to use the electronic communications networks that post prices on Nasdaq's market-maker system. Broadway charges customers 2 cents (U.S.) a share in commissions on trades and, for another $1,200, will train neophytes on the art of day trading.

The technology allows you to trade from home. A number of Internet services, such as the Pristine Day Trader, provide a "virtual" trading room where clients can obtain a steady flow of stock market data, commentary and trading tips. "Breakouts and stocks that are on the verge of exploding to the upside are issued in a matter of seconds," its promotional literature says.

The bull market, particularly among technology stocks, has been a day trader's dream in recent months. Traders who can take phone calls -- conversations, not surprisingly, are usually limited to five-second bursts -- claim they have made killings on Yahoo, Amazon.com, Lycos and other gravity-defying Internet names. Yahoo gained $26.37 one day last week.

Stocks, though, do not have to soar into the stratosphere to make money for day traders. They are happy to sell shares for 1/8 or even 1/16 of a point (known as a "teenie") higher than their purchase price. If you buy enough shares, say 1,000 at a time, and do it often enough in a day, you can go home with a tidy profit. The bravest players will buy on margin, giving them greater exposure to a particular stock, or go short, allowing them to make money when shares go into reverse.

A day trader in New Jersey says the one golden rule is to go for big, liquid stocks. "The key is to be able to get out in a hurry," he says. "When a stock goes into reverse, you don't want to face a vacuum of buyers and sellers. That's when you can get murdered." Stocks with volatile trading patterns are also favourites because they have more potential for short-term gains.

Whether you like it or not, day traders are here to stay and they are coming to Canada. Although no professional day-trading firm such as Schonfeld exists, some Bay Street firms are devoting an employee or two to the business and home-day traders, equipped with their fancy Internet software, are popping up everywhere.

They should be encouraged. Their advent has helped to break the near monopoly of the big, expensive market makers, adding a healthy dollop of democracy to the stock markets. "We help to level the playing field," one trader says.




To: Kerm Yerman who wrote (11706)7/13/1998 3:14:00 AM
From: Kerm Yerman  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 15196
 
MARKET ACTIVITY/ WEEKEND EDITION OF TRADING NOTES JULY 12, 1998 (8)

OIL & GAS

OPEC Must Not Repeat November's "Mistake"

KUWAIT, July 12 - Kuwait Oil Minister Sheikh Saud Nasser al-Sabah said in an interview published on Sunday that given the depressed oil price OPEC should not repeat the "big mistake" it made last November when it raised its production ceiling.

The minister, who assumed office in March, also told al- Qabas daily that the two production cuts made since March by OPEC and non-OPEC oil producers will probably need to be extended to shore up the oil price which is at its lowest level in a decade.

"The current inclination to face the drop in oil prices is to cut production and this should continue," Sheikh Saud said. "Any view to raise production is a big mistake."

Kuwait's daily OPEC quota was raised to 2.19 million barrels as of January 1 from two million when OPEC agreed at a meeting in November in Jakarta to raise the overall ceiling by about 10 percent to 27.5 million bpd.

But after the two rounds of cuts, Kuwait's quota has dropped to 1.98 million bpd. Since March, OPEC has been forced to cut 2.6 million bpd from the ceiling set last November.

Sheikh Saud said that by raising the ceiling, at a time that demand was hit by mild weather and the financial crisis in Asia, OPEC merely legitimised those countries violating their quotas.

"One of the biggest mistakes...was the Jakarta agreement to raise production...thus legalising violations and the violating countries further violated (their quotas)," said the minister who is seen by some analysts as a price hawk.

In contrast to previous Kuwait oil ministers who have fought for a higher production level for their country, Sheikh Saud has often argued that a higher oil price is more important.

In his newspaper interview, the oil minister said that given the high level of oil in storage -- which he estimated at six billion barrels - "the world could do without OPEC's oil for a long period."

OPEC's daily crude oil production in June was about 27.95 million, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA) which also said that industry-held oil stocks in the world's industrialised nations hit an all-time record at the end of May.

Bellwether Brent blend August futures closed 14 cents down in London on Friday at $12.89 a barrel -- a fall of nearly 70 cents on the week and more than $6 below average 1997 prices.

Sheikh Saud said the average price for Kuwaiti crudes has risen in recent weeks to around $10 a barrel from an earlier $7 a barrel compared with budget estimates of $13 a barrel for the fiscal year which ended on June 30. Oil revenue in the current 1998/99 draft budget was based on a $12 barrel.

He said Kuwaitis do not realise the extent of economic hardship their tiny Gulf Arab state was facing, adding that to wipe out a 1.596 billion dinar ($5.196 billion) deficit in the current 4.41 billion dinar budget, Kuwaiti crudes would have to rise to above $18 a barrel.

"What is astonishing is that we are a nation of 700,000 (Kuwaitis) and with all our brothers (foreign residents) we become two million people, so do we need a four billion dinar budget? By God I do not understand the situation," added Sheikh Saud, a former information minister and ambassador.

Kuwaitis enjoy many benefits in the cradle-to-grave welfare state which provides most basic services either free or heavily subsidised.

Iran Didn't Agree To Riyadh Pact Terms

CARACAS, July 10 - Alberto Quiros Corradi, a top Venezuelan oil adviser, said Friday that Iran didn't agree with the ground rules of the Riyadh pact to cut oil output and he suspected they were breaking the agreement for that reason.

Quiros, who was a key member of Venezuela's team in the Riyadh talks, said Iran didn't agree that cuts should be made from real production, but rather from its OPEC quota, which was higher than its production level.

"In Iran, one could talk of violation because the real point of departure of its measures was not the one agreed to," he told a local radio station.

"Iran was always reluctant to accept the rule that the cut should be measured from real production instead of quotas...It so happened that Iran was producing less than its quota so they wanted to go back to the concept of quotas and, of course, everyone opposed that."

Quiros, who despite his seniority in Venezuelan oil circles is neither a staff member of state oil company Petroleos de Venezuela (PDVSA) nor a Ministry employee, said he, therefore, suspected that Iran was violating what it had ostensibly agreed with other members of the Organization for Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC).

"I suspect, and it is only a suspicion, that they are ignoring the real production agreement and measured their cut from a higher level. That could represent about a 200,000-barrels-per-day (bpd) difference," he said.

Although it had an official OPEC quota of 3.942 million bpd, Iran agreed in March to cut by 140,000 bpd from its real output level, which was established at 3.623 million bpd. Venezuela's state oil company Petroleos de Venezuela (PDVSA) and the Energy and Mines Ministry have given mixed signals about its compliance with its commitment.

On Monday, PDVSA President Luis Giusti said Iran broke the agreement by 230,000 bpd, and he was backed up by PDVSA first vice president Claus Graf, who confirmed the figure.

But Energy and Mines Minister Erwin Arrieta contradicted them Friday, saying he had no evidence of violation.

Iran emphatically rejected Giusti's accusation on Wednesday, blaming the current crisis in oil markets on Giusti and asking him not to rely so much on "secondary sources" for production data.

In the Riyadh pact, producers agreed to use secondary sources as the measure of production, since governments have used false data in the past.

In its monthly survey of OPEC oil output, Reuters found that Iran produced 3.72 million bpd in April, 237,000 bpd above the level agreed in the Riyadh pact.

Quiros said that Iran's non-compliance, added to a 400,000 bpd increase in Iraqi output, which wasn't included in the Riyadh pact, meant that OPEC's declared 1.245 million bpd cut from April only removed about 500,000 bpd of oil from the market.

After the Riyadh pact failed to lift oil prices significantly from their 10-year lows, OPEC agreed in Vienna, following preliminary talks in Amsterdam, to another set of cuts, bringing the group's total agreed cut to 2.6 million bpd.

"I hope the Amsterdam agreement that starts on July 1 will have an effect on the inventories during August and that in September we should start to see a small recovery in prices, and this should become more apparent in October, November and December," Quiros added.

OPEC Official Says Oil Output Cuts Will Be Met

WASHINGTON July 10 - The world is awash in oil, and gas prices in the United States are the lowest in decades.

Late last month, the OPEC that made the world cringe in the 1970s announced an oil production cut of 1.3 million barrels a day to help rally prices. But oil prices are not rising, and the secretary-general of OPEC told skeptics here Thursday that the production cuts will be met.

Rilwanu Lukman said that member countries of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, some of whom are notorious for cheating on oil quotas, will stick to the agreed cuts to strengthen prices.

''OPEC member countries are working to ensure that recent cuts are fully adhered to,'' he said before 150 attendees at the Gulf-Asia Energy Security Conference. ''This agreement is based on voluntary self-discipline, and this time around they are going to do everything to comply to generate better oil prices.''

The move raised the amount that the cartel promised to withhold from the oil markets to 2.6 million barrels a day. Non-OPEC countries Mexico, Russia, Oman. and others agreed to a further one-half million barrel-a-day reduction, increasing the total number to 3.1 million. Experts say OPEC members will adhere to the most recent plan because of the financial pain that is being inflicted on the countries because of loss of oil revenue.

OPEC members have lost 30 per cent to 40 per cent of revenue and that is biting into national budgets, which in turn could lead to domestic problems. ''OPEC has lost $48 billion in revenue,'' said Dr. Fadhil Chalabi, executive director of the London based Centre for Global Energy Studies.

The lost revenue brought the 11 OPEC members in line; even those who have ignored production quotas such as Venezuela may abide by the accord made last month. For the time being, critics say.

''They came together because the collapse in price made it so difficult for them, Dr. Chalabi, a former assistant secretary-general of OPEC, said. ''But once the prices begin to rise again, this agreement has no guarantee to hold.'' This, he predicted, will create price volatility.

Despite the financial crisis in Asia which curbed economic growth and energy use and is a factor in the fall in oil prices, the demand for oil from the Persian Gulf region, whose countries are a dominant force in OPEC, will continue to grow over the medium and long-term, Dr. Lukman said. ''Middle East oil producers will be in the forefront meeting that demand.''

The secretary-general asserted that the oil cartel is not losing its competitive edge to non-OPEC countries from the lack of technical development. ''Not to worry. Those companies working in the North Sea [and providing new technology] are working in the gulf countries as well. We stand our ground on that basis.''

Dr. Lukman took pains to point out that the recent announcement by Saudi Arabia's oil minister, Ali Al-Naomi, suggesting the creation of an informal alliance of oil exporting countries to bolster sagging prices, does not mean a new oil cartel will be established.

The alliance would be a way to complement OPEC policies, not a structural organization, Dr. Lukman said. ''OPEC is a bloc, an organization interested in bringing on board as many members as possible to create a stable oil market.''

Output Cuts Could Still Take Some Time To Impact Markets

"Oil now slowly making its way to the market must be absorbed (and) the enormous inventories accumulated by consuming countries must be run down," the IEA said.

"The onslaught of waterborne crude oil produced in the second quarter will hit the market this quarter," it added.

The extent of oversupply earlier in the year meant commercial oil inventories held in Organisation for Economic Cooperation Development (OECD) countries hit record levels at the end of May.

OECD industry stocks rose by 2.24 million barrels a day (bpd) in May to reach 2.632 billion barrels, the highest on record, said the IEA.

"Industry stocks are now at levels that are challenging existing available storage capacity, especially in the U.S.," it said.

Indonesia Expects Oil Price to Go Up in 4th Quarter

Indonesia expects that the price of oil will rise to 17 U.S. dollars a barrel in the fourth quarter of this year, the Indonesian Observer reported Saturday, quoting a senior official.

"I'm aware of the current lower price. It (the price) is usually low in every third quarter of the year, but it will increase in the fourth quarter," Mines and Energy Minister Kuntoro Mangkusubroto said Friday.

"I'm optimistic that 17 U.S. dollars a barrel can still be achieved," he said.

The key factor behind any future price rise will be the maintenance of an agreement reached between the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) members to cut production output, he said.

The world's top oil producers grouped under OPEC agreed on July 3 to cut production by 3.23 million barrels per day (bpd) in a bid to reduce a glut and boost prices.

Indonesia, with its May 1998 output reaching 1.33 million bpd, is set to cut output by 100,000 bpd.

"The revenue from oil is very important for Indonesia. We want to see the oil price higher," Kuntoro said.

It was reported that the price of OPEC's basket of several crudes in the world market rose to 11.62 U.S. dollar a barrel on Friday, up from 11.51 U.S. dollars a barrel on Tuesday.

Analysts See Long Haul For Oil Price Recovery

LONDON, July 10 - Oil exporters' output cuts should prove enough to haul crude prices a little higher by the end of the year but oil will stay far cheaper than in recent years, a Reuters poll of industry experts found on Friday.

Producers meanwhile may face a market relapse at any time if Asia's economic crisis deepens or they lose resolve in carrying through pledged output cuts, the experts warned.

A survey of investment banks, energy consultants and oil firms forecast an average fourth quarter Brent crude price of $15.94 a barrel up from $14.51 in the third quarter.

That would represent just a mild recovery from Brent's current rut near $13. Brent has averaged just $14.28 so far in 1998 -- five dollars below last year and six below the average $20.30 a barrel of 1996.

Brent was expected to remain under the cosh next year at just $16.12, the average of analysts forecasts showed.

''We upped our third quarter forecast 50 cents just on the psychological effect of last month's new production cuts,'' said Mike Barry of London's Energy Market Consultants.

''But the fundamentals if anything are more bearish. Asia-Pacific demand is looking worse every day.''

''The only thing that's certain is that prices will be volatile,'' said Richard Savage of SG Securities in London. SG believes Brent will crawl back above $16 by the end of the year to complete a $15 full year average.

Consultants were less optimistic on the prospects for a recovery in oil prices than financiers.

An average of three consultants and one oil company forecast just $15.45 for fourth quarter Brent slipping back to $14.95 for 1999. Seven banks projected a fourth quarter price of $16.20 a barrel, rising to $16.79 next year.

Iraq remains a wild card for oil prices and attention now is focusing on October's United Nations report on Iraqi weapons compliance.

Iraq will be pushing hard for an all-clear on sanctions, allowing full resumption of oil exports through an energy infrastructure enhanced by a recent $300 million injection for repairs.

But if Baghdad is thwarted in October, analysts say it might call off the U.N. oil-for-food exchange altogether, easing producers' problems at a stroke.

''The big question for the oil market is what's coming back faster, Asia or Iraq,'' says Roger Diwan of Washington's Petroleum Finance Company.

''In the fourth quarter Brent could be anywhere between $10 and $20 depending on what Iraq does.''

Most analysts agree that over three million barrels per day (bpd) of producer cuts thrashed out in three stages this year will eventually ease the gargantuan stock surplus suffocating any price revival.

But they caution that OPEC producers must keep up the 75 percent compliance level with cuts managed so far, and be prepared to reduce more later this year if prices are still languishing.

''It all depends on whether they do what they say they're going to do,'' said Ken Haley, chief economist at Chevron (CHV). ''The fourth quarter is likely to be higher than the third quarter but after that it's a crapshoot.''

And many add that as prices creep higher, producers could renege on cutback commitments to renourish revenue-starved economies.

''There are a lot of promises not being fulfilled as quickly as they need to be,'' said Alan Struth, chief economist of U.S. independent Phillips Petroleum (P).

''As we get to the fourth quarter I imagine there will be a lot of foot-dragging.''

''Everybody's in the nail-biting stage,'' said Peter Bogin of Cambridge Energy Research Associates, who sees Brent heading for a range between $15 and $16.

More cause for producer optimism was seen by Jurjen Lunshof of Credit Lyonnais. He visualised Brent back up to $18 by the fourth quarter.

''They've got no choice but to enforce the cuts. Low oil prices are a sufficient driver to knock some sense into them,'' he said.

''Demand in US is pretty robust and we should start seeing some inventory rebuilding in Asia. 'La Nina' means we should get a more normal winter too.''

La Nina is the cold weather pattern that weather watchers believe is now following the El Nina global heatwave partly responsible for last winter's demand slump.

Economic realities also mean that sustained low oil prices must eventually force enough supply off the market to force values back up to a more familiar range.

''The non-OPEC producers, with high-cost output are the ones who will really start to suffer if prices stay at this sort of level for long,'' said Kleinwort Benson's Mehdi Varzi, predicting $16 Brent from the fourth quarter.

Details of the poll of Brent price forecasts for third quarter and fourth quarter 1998 and full year 1999 in dollars a barrel are as follows:

............................................................................... 3Q '98....4Q '98....1999
Cambridge Energy Research, Paris........................... 14.00.....15-16.....15-16
Credit Lyonnais, London.......................................... 15.50.....18.00.....19.00
Credit Suisse First Boston, New York ..................... 15.00.....16.50.....17.50
Deutsche Morgan Grenfell, London.......................... 14.00.....14.00.....15.00
Energy Market Consultants, London ....................... 14.00.....15.00.....14.00
Dresdner Kleinwort Benson, London ...................... 14.00.....16.00.....16.00
Lehman Brothers, New York................................... 13.85.....16.50.....16.50
Merrill Lynch, London............................................. 15.25.....16.25.....17.50
Petroleum Finance, Washington .............................. 14.55.....15.30.....15.30
Phillips Petroleum, Tulsa........................................... 14.00.....16.00.....15.00
SG Securities, London ............................................ 15.50.....16.27.....16.00
Average.................................................................. 14.51......15.94.....16.12

IEA Says Russia New Blow To Oil Market Rescue

LONDON, July 9 - Russia's foundering economy is the latest blow for a world oil market already suffering a severe downturn at the hands of Asia's financial crisis, the International Energy Agency said on Thursday.

A deterioration in Russia's finances had forced more oil on to glutted markets in the west in recent months, the IEA said in its Monthly Oil Market Report.

Net oil exports from the former Soviet territories, mainly Russia, hit 3.1 million barrels daily in May, a record for post-Soviet times, the agency said.

"The Russian government is determined to collect taxes, leaving cash strapped oil companies to turn to high exports for hard currencies," the IEA said.

"The economic situation has had, and will continue to have, a dampening effect on consumption with the original expectation of an acceleration in economic growth in 1998 now severely dented."

Low world crude prices are regarded as one of the major causes behind Russia's latest financial crisis but nationwide non-payments mean exports remain the only reliable means for cash-strapped Russian oil companies.

Rising Russian exports come despite Moscow's pledge to play its part in an unprecedented international effort by oil exporters to revive their market by cutting supplies.

Oil prices remained under severe pressure from record inventories, slow demand growth and an onslaught of crude approaching western markets, the IEA said.

Large volumes of oil in transit built up from overproduction earlier in the year were blocking a price recovery.

"Absorbing the oil slowly on its way to market could prove as difficult as staunching the daily flow of overproduction," the IEA said.

"The potential arrival of these barrels in the third quarter could confound efforts by producers to run down onshore excess stocks and rebalance the market."

OPEC producers earlier in June agreed with non-OPEC nations on a second round of output cuts in the space of three months in a bid to raise oil prices from 10-year lows.

OPEC agreed cuts totalling 2.6 million barrels a day from the 75 million barrels daily market and non-OPEC suppliers Mexico, Norway and Oman chipped in with their own supply cuts.

But the output reductions will take some time to make an impact on a market where prices hit 10-year lows earlier this year.

Benchmark Brent blend was valued at just $13.22 a barrel on Thursday, still $6 lower than on average last year.

"Oil now slowly making its way to the market must be absorbed (and) the enormous inventories accumulated by consuming countries must be run down," the IEA said.

"The onslaught of waterborne crude oil produced in the second quarter will hit the market this quarter," it added.

The extent of oversupply earlier in the year meant commercial oil inventories held in Organisation for Economic Cooperation Development (OECD) countries hit record levels at the end of May.

OECD industry stocks rose by 2.24 million barrels a day (bpd) in May ballooning to 2.63 billion barrels by the end of the month, the highest level on record at the Paris-based IEA.

"Industry stocks are now at levels that are challenging existing available storage capacity, especially in the U.S.," it said.

A slowdown in world petroleum demand growth has not helped producers' market rescue plans. The IEA's estimate for world demand this year was revised lower to 74.9 million bpd, marking annual growth of 1.1 million compared with 2.1 million last year.

Low Japanese demand in the power generating sector also exacerbated the slide in oil consumption among Asian economies.

"Japanese deliveries decreased year-on-year of the eighth successive month, reflecting a continuing decline in oil use in the power generation sector and an increasingly apparent slowdown in economic activity," the IEA said.

The IEA said last month it was expecting zero oil demand growth this year from Asian economies with the exception of China.