Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : BASHERS POST THEM HERE!!!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (284)	7/12/1998 2:54:00 PM
From: Dave Gore	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 390

Actually you are right Janice. 246810 does not appear under that name (i.e 246810) on your thread. I could even be wrong about HIM being in your little group. IF I am, I apologize to him only. But that's rather missing the point anyway, isn't it? What is obvious is that lots of you who say you don't work together ARE there. And in lots of other places. And people will always be suspicious of others who travel in groups and don't expose their true objectives. At least with hypesters (whom you say you hate) and bashers who admit they are shorting a stock, it is obvious what their agenda is. Several of you, though, seem very curious. And you of all people are the most unique one.... you seem to love to post damning evidence about yourself and your compatriots. It appears that you are figuring people will find it anyway, so you bring it out into the open to minimize it's damage. Who knows, it is really not worth thinking about that much...I do it partly because I love a good mystery and partly because many are convinced you guys are trouble. Me, I have not made up my mind about you. Here is a paragraph from the link you posted on your last post a few minutes ago.... NOTE: THE FOLLOWING IS AN ACTUAL QUOTE FROM THE POSTER OF THE MESSAGE THAT WAS LISTED VOLUNTARILY BY JANICE SHELL IN HER (i.e Janice's) PREVIOUS POST. IT SPEAKS TO THE CURIOUS BEHAVIOR OF JANICE AND THE OTHER WHO STARTED THE FBN AND FBNA HOAX AND QUESTIONS THE MOTIVES OF THE GROUP THAT JANICE IS A PART OF. "More questions: 1. Do we really believe that FBN and SI's relationships are anything less than contrived? 2. And for what purpose? 3. And why so many of "them" bashing various stocks? 4. Some bad stocks but some very legit and good stocks. 5. And how many of them Canadians? Forthright clearly is and who else????? 6. And is the "rumored" Canadian US BB stock shorting scheme really only a rumor? 7. And is SI involved? There's lot's more, but looking casually though some of the posts this am, left me no choice but to continue a little deeper. Call it constructive paranoia." END OF QUOTE. Hmmmm......Janice you are a mystery woman and it seems you just love the notoriety. Paraphrasing Dave Zglodowsi (sp?) of SI said in his article about you lalst Friday.....Janice Shell and the gang seemed to have gotten their 15 minutes of fame... Gosh...good goin' Janice... your life is complete. But you may end up being "infamous" instead of "famous".

To: Janice Shell who wrote (284)	7/12/1998 3:01:00 PM
From: Mama Bear	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 390

Hmm, and I'm shorting the heck out of FBN. But then no one has put my name on the list, or warned others that I am a "basher" on this thread. Of course I freely admitted on the FBN thread that I worked for "Short Sellers, Inc.", and that we always succeed in destroying the price of a stock once we cast our evil eye upon it's ticker symbol. Personally I'd like to see the longs understand that it's no use in fighting us, and if they'd only step aside when we announce our intention, the price would drop much quicker, and they could then buy twice, three, or even four times as many shares from us as they owned previously. It could be win win for everyone. Instead the longs choose to posture, fight, and write letters to the SEC. In the end, they lose all their equity, the SEC yawns, and it takes us more time and effort, so we are forced to compensate by driving the price of the target even lower. I ask you, where is the sense in that? The "dreaded" Barbara J. Payne