To: Hawkmoon who wrote (49577 ) 7/13/1998 12:42:00 PM From: Riley G Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 55532
From: Ron Reece Monday, Jul 13 1998 7:26AM ET Reply # of 49579 ----cut---- You are drawing much attention to yourself in your attempt to defame and slander me. Answer: Wrong, just seeing were the investigation winds up and what new charges may be filed.. ---cut more dribble--- I and many other GRNO shareholders traveled to Charleston, SC to do our diligence(over 75 separate individuals). We may have made mistakes in uncovering any liabilities, but you are claiming that each and every person that did so is equally guilty of this alledged fraud. Answer: The trouble is. It appears that at least 4 of your trips were paid for by GRNO (from the reported SEC civil filings). Did they pay for anyone else? ---Even more dribble removed-- And that includes you Riley. I have one more lesson for you to learn. You're actions seem those of a man who knows that he may have possibly violated one or more statutes of the securities law himself and wants to distract attention from his actions. Answer: LOL at that paragraph. I have NEVER met, took, or agreed to receive illegal or legal benefits from any one. Unlike others, I am not for sale, nor can I be rented! The more you engage yourself in the GRNO issue, the more attention you draw to yourself. Answer: And you. IMHO opinion, I think that the SEC's investigations into GRNO are really just beginning, and I hope that they follow the players to other possible illegal actions that they may have committed elsewhere! You have accused me of alledged fraud with regard to GRNO. You say I hyped this stock and fooled 2,400 different shareholders, including myself and my wife, into believing the company had substance when in fact I alledgedly knew it was a scam. Answer: I did not say that, the SEC has. The SEC even has filed a reported civil complaint against GRNO and yourself. So who has really said what? But now you protest my Naysaying activity with regard to another company, WHERE I WAS OPPOSED to the hype surrounding this stock. If you go back to my original posts I purposefully stated that I would only rely upon publicly available information, or information that has been confirmed from numerous sources. Answer: I don't protest any of your messages. I am only trying to seek the truth, and as it stands now. You are suspect in any stock dealings, be they long or short. Afterall according to what other nays and yourself have claimed about RMIL, the SEC has followed suit and brought you into a civil complaint as a defendant. That's a really did difference that just being halted and detained for answers. I hope for your sake that the SEC was wrong, but I doubt they were. -----Dribble deletion-- RMIL is no less responsible for misrepresentation to the public market than GRNO has been. And you have NO IDEA just what the authorities are up to, so don't be foolish and claim the 8K satisfied the SEC and that their satisfied. (ie: don't throw rocks in that beautiful glass house of yours). You might be surprised. Answer: Then let the glass (pieces) fall were it may. I for one can say that I am not for sale, nor rent, and never will be. Something it appears you should have said a long time ago. Riley G RMIL Shareholder and counter of the shares. And I am not selling any RMIL until my own shareholder values are reached... Right now that started at over $50 per share, and can be revised!