SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : JAWS;A P/E of 2 with 150%/yr Erngs Growth!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mel L. who wrote (2013)7/13/1998 10:09:00 AM
From: del clark  Respond to of 4230
 
I have heard rumors and they are just rumors mind you, that has some people in Canada have been shorting various American Stocks and are resorting to going out over the internet and writing various lies about stocks to create panic selling.

I have heard from someone who has taken an Art Bell course in journalism that TGSK is a scam. This source also believes the X-files to be scientific fact.



To: Mel L. who wrote (2013)7/13/1998 10:12:00 AM
From: eugene sacomano  Respond to of 4230
 
yeah right! this comapny is such a big scam that 2 of my friends were able to vist the company, and that tgsk was able to sign deals wtih polaris and get moody on their board!!! GET A LIFE!



To: Mel L. who wrote (2013)7/13/1998 3:59:00 PM
From: Jon Klaus  Respond to of 4230
 
Re: Houston Chronicle article

Mel,

Interesting technique here. Name drop a reliable source to infer it supports a rumor you got from some unspecified source, when in fact the article makes NO MENTION WHATSOEVER of TGSK.

You said: "I have heard that artificial buying is going on with TGSK...a possible scam stock..which was addressed in
the Houston Chronicle this morning..The article "did not" mention
this stock, but someone I trust told me this one "may" be a scam."

What's the HC article have to do with TGSK? Sure there are scam BB stocks, but you didn't present a shred of evidence that TGSK was among them. You invoke the legitimacy of the Houston Chronicle and the refer to a rumor from an un-named source and no evidence. Give us some facts if you have them. Rumors, especially false ones are a dime a dozen.

I read the article. It's good. It's basically saying "let the buyer beware." Good advice. It DOES NOT SAY, IMPLY, OR INFER that TGSK is a scam, as you do. Here's the link:

chron.com

JK



To: Mel L. who wrote (2013)7/13/1998 4:06:00 PM
From: Jon Klaus  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4230
 
Sorry about that formatting.

Also that link didn't seem to take, so here is the text:

>>>>>>>>>>

Paper: Houston Chronicle
Date: MON 07/13/98
Section: BUSINESS
Page: 2
Edition: 2 STAR

OTC Bulletin Board has image woes

By JAY GREENE
Orange County Register

Meet Dragon Energy Group, a small Irvine, Calif., company that owns 80 percent of a power plant in
China.

Last fall, Dragon didn't exist. The company was known as Vialux and it had just agreed to buy
undeveloped property near Monterey, Calif.

A year before that, Vialux didn't exist. Then, the company was called Allied Biotechnology and it sold
products to enhance hair regrowth.

Make your head spin? The OTC (over-the-counter) Bulletin Board, the backwater stock -quotation
system where Dragon's shares can be found, is home to hundreds of such chameleons. Company
histories get rewritten daily. Futures often are vague at best. It's a virtually unregulated market, fraught
with everything from heavy losses to investment fraud. There's also the occasional financial jackpot.

Dragon may well become a great success. But it's hard to imagine a company such as Dragon surviving
on one of the large stock exchanges. Indeed, their rules generally prohibit trading of companies that, like
Dragon, don't report financial results or meet certain trading requirements. The Bulletin Board, though,
welcomes the Dragons of the world with open arms.

As informal as the Bulletin Board sounds, it is exploding. Today, nearly 6,400 companies are quoted on
the Bulletin Board, up 9 percent from a year ago. What's more, investors traded nearly $5.5 billion of
Bulletin Board stocks in March, up 69 percent from March 1997.

To some, the Bulletin Board is pure capitalism - a place where companies with barely a hint of a
financial plan persuade investors to take a chance. To others, the system is a breeding ground for fraud
- an invitation for hucksters to take advantage of naive investors hoping for the big hit.

The Bulletin Board is a loosely regulated service that posts real-time stock quotes, last sale prices and
volume information. All it takes for a stock to trade on the Bulletin Board is a sponsoring brokerage
firm, which generally then controls the market for that stock .

Unlike their counterparts that trade on the New York and American stock exchanges or the Nasdaq
market, Bulletin Board companies need not file periodic financial information with the Securities and
Exchange Commission for investors to inspect. And half the Bulletin Board companies don't.

But as the Bulletin Board has grown, regulating it has become increasingly unwieldy. And investors get
lulled because they can call up a stock quote or find a research report of a Bulletin Board company just
as they would companies that trade on the Nasdaq or the New York Stock Exchange.

"For many investors, it has the look and feel of the regulated markets, such as the Nasdaq, the New
York and the Amex," said Barry R. Goldsmith, executive vice president of enforcement for the National
Association of Securities Dealers' regulatory division. "People don't necessarily understand what it is."

As the Bulletin Board has grown, so have the small-stock scams . The SEC believes that investors
were bilked out of $6 billion last year in small-stock fraud, with a large chunk of that coming from
Bulletin Board companies.

The most common Bulletin Board stock scam is a so-called "pump and dump" scheme. First, those who
would defraud accumulate a large block of a company's stock , then start hyping it through misleading
news releases and bogus postings on Internet bulletin boards. That's the pump.

Investors get suckered into buying the stock , either believing the hype or jumping in to catch a ride on
the stock 's momentum. As the shares soar, the perpetrators of the fraud sell. That's the dump.

Scams often start with cold-calling. A young broker with a script working from a boiler room phones
potential investors with a high-pressure offer to get in on "a great investment opportunity." They rarely
take no for an answer.

The SEC said cold-calling abuses represent the fastest-growing category of complaints, jumping more
than 23 percent last year.

If this is a market where many investors get stung, why is it growing so rapidly? Because it plays off the
optimism in the overall stock market, said Goldsmith.

Add the Internet to the mix. It provides a convenient way for stock touts to hype stocks that otherwise
couldn't find buyers. Finally, the Bulletin Board plays to the lottery dreams of investors who hope for a
quick killing.

In perhaps the most publicized small-stock fraud case, regulators shut down A.R. Baron & Co., a New
York brokerage, for rampant unauthorized trading in customer accounts. The SEC accused the firm of
manipulating the stocks of two companies and swindling customers out of $17 million. The case is still
pending, but a few former Baron executives have pleaded guilty and agreed to help prosecutors.

To be sure, the Bulletin Board isn't a complete cesspool. Many small community banks and some
established foreign companies' American depositary receipts - or ADRs - are listed on the Bulletin
Board. And there are the occasional diamonds in the rough.

Though hardly a Microsoft, Fireplace Manufacturers of Santa Ana, Calif., was a home run for an
investor who bought the fireplace maker in its early days. The company muddled along for several years
before a fake-log maker, Desa International, agreed to buy it for $23 million in March. That's a 20-fold
gain for investors who picked up the stock two years ago.

But the real dream for most reputable Bulletin Board companies is to move to the Nasdaq or the
American or New York stock exchanges. Endocare, an Irvine maker of devices to treat prostate
disease, began its life on the Bulletin Board when it was spun out of Medstone International in 1996. A
year ago, it graduated.

With so many dubious companies trading on the Bulletin Board, some investors simply shy away from
all OTC companies for fear of getting burned. The bylaws of many institutional investors, for example,
bar Bulletin Board stock ownership.

In some investors' eyes, Endocare wasn't any different from its more speculative - or even corrupt -
Bulletin Board brethren. So while the Bulletin Board gave Endocare a springboard to the public
markets, it also limited its access to investors.

"Our institutional ownership has really grown quite dramatically since we moved to the Nasdaq," said
Endocare's chairman and chief executive, Paul W. Mikus.

Bulletin Board companies fall pretty much into three groups - the small potatoes, companies without
enough business to rank on the major stock exchanges; the works-in-progress, firms with ideas but no
sales; and the fallen angels, companies disgraced by bad news.

Perhaps what's most ironic about the skullduggery on the Bulletin Board is that the Bulletin Board itself
was created to curb fraud. The system's roots run directly to the SEC's Penny Stock Task Force,
created a decade ago to stem fraud in small-company stocks.

Previously, investing information about small-company stocks could only be had from the so-called
"Pink Sheets," daily lists of bid and offer prices for stocks that were often outdated by the time they hit a
broker's desk. The Bulletin Board became the automated alternative to the Pink Sheets, offering
real-time price and volume information. In addition, the Bulletin Board gave regulators the ability to
monitor trading more closely.

SEC Chairman Arthur Levitt told a securities trade group in April that the agency would have "zero
tolerance" for brokers who abuse Bulletin Board stocks.

"These rogue firms are professional only in the sense they have mastered the art of hucksterism, of
preying on investors' lack of sophistication," Levitt said. "When one of their brokers picks up a phone,
it's almost as dangerous as when a drunk gets behind a wheel."

Copyright notice: All materials in this archive are copyrighted by Houston Chronicle Publishing Company Division,
Hearst Newspapers Partnership, L.P., or its news and feature syndicates and wire services. No materials may be
directly or indirectly published, broadcast rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed in any medium.
Neither these materials nor any portion thereof may be stored in a computer except for personal and non-commercial
use.
<<<<<<<<



To: Mel L. who wrote (2013)7/13/1998 4:30:00 PM
From: Jack of All Trades  Respond to of 4230
 
Mel,

As you are a CPA I hope your aware of the legalities of your comments.

JeffG