Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Altair Nanotechnologies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dr. Seuss who wrote (391)	7/13/1998 2:11:00 PM
From: Gupper2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 603

Dr. Seuss, You do seem intent on your purpose to label this stock a fraud. Is there a way that you can address this in a factual way or is this only your opinion?? You do realize that slander is illegal do you not?? And that the FTC can grab all the info it wants about you if it feels that you are slandering or purposely trying to manipulate the price of a stock?? Look over your shoulder and be wary, you reap what you sow..

To: Dr. Seuss who wrote (391)	7/13/1998 7:55:00 PM
From: jas singh MD	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 603

Good evening Seuss, Could you point out why TZMI and Dupont are involved in a "fraudulent stock"? What portion of my last post did you find objectionable? In the past, some shorts had contended that there was no evidence that indicated that the Tenn. property could be economically mined. This is a very important point! The report from TZMI indicates that the property CAN be economically mined. What portion of the report do you find objectionable? Instead of throwing around wild accusations, why don't you contribute to this thread by bringing up issues regarding the CJ/ Tenn. property or even the coal industry so that we can all benefit by looking at both sides of the issue? Why is it that some of the shorts can do very little but accuse individuals of being "paid" to discuss issues involving a particular company? In regards to hype, I've got a long way to go before I attain the level of HYPE-neg you dish out! BTW, I would suggest that you read the recent article that appears in the FT regarding what is said about a company in these chat sites...you may decide to change some of the words you use to describe certain companies. Sincerely, Jas