Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (14212)	7/13/1998 10:05:00 AM
From: mark silvers	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Richard FWIW, the problem with the exchanges was that Naxos couldn't do a SFA,and wasnt really attempting to. I think they were trying to use Merwyn White's technology then, although I have to admit that it is all starting to blur together in my memory. Kitty was saying that Naxos has gone down the conventional path before and failed.Which isnt really the case, to the best of my knowledge. Mark

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (14212)	7/13/1998 10:23:00 AM
From: Henry Volquardsen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Rcichard, FWIW I do not think Lionel Hungar is kitty. Hungry Lion would never have supported anyone involved in Naxos management as he did in the following post:https://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=5126985 where he said People, we must support Carl Campbell. It is our only hope for progress at Franklin Lakes and a higher share price. Something must be done to correct the current situation. Carl has correctly identified the problems and his advice is sound. That is not our old friend Hungry Lion. I suspect it is someone a bit more clever who knows how many of us would respond to Hungry Lion. His agenda seems much more to be one of promoting J/L than HL's old agenda of bashing everything associated with Naxos. FWIW Mark's comments regarding conventional are similar to my own feelings. Henry