SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Grantcw who wrote (23596)7/14/1998 1:26:00 AM
From: Krowbar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
Grant, Remember that I said that it is rare for a textbook to mention evolution, much less teach it in any depth. I should have said "up to through the high school level" by the way. I can't foresee what a teacher says about it. If you want an example of the other extreme, my daughter had a math teacher who spent a short time every day on the lesson, and the bulk of the time talking about the Bible. In Math! Nothing was ever done about it even after many complaints. His students did very poorly in math tests. Duh.

Dolphins were once land mammals that returned to the sea, so the analogy would be valid.

Del



To: Grantcw who wrote (23596)7/16/1998 1:05:00 AM
From: Grainne  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
Grant, in reading your post to Del about evolution, I think you may be operating on a misunderstanding. When you remark that it does not make that teacher look good to suggest we could evolve back into the water, it sounds like you are making some kind of determination that higher animals live outside water. Dolphins are about the most evolved animals on the planet, in many ways, so that isn't true. Besides that, there is nothing inherently better about living on land. And to evolve just means to change in order to survive better, which could be to land from water, or to water from land. It is more about developing to survive, than where that happens.