SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : MIDL .... A Real Sleeper -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: grw5 who wrote (2380)7/13/1998 12:53:00 PM
From: Dusty  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 7039
 
grw5

Was anything said about the forum owners being required to archive ALL posts?

I notice today that the original post # 2363 posted Saturday, July 11th at 11:33AM by GaBard to me has been removed, and another post has now replaced it. I wonder why?

Dusty



To: grw5 who wrote (2380)7/13/1998 12:58:00 PM
From: Frank Fontaine  Respond to of 7039
 
Hi George; I'm doing alright My friend. Is it Ok with You if I repost You words on another thread George? And thanks for giving Me this information. I think people should be held accountable for posting slander and missinformation about Companies and the people who run them.
Frank



To: grw5 who wrote (2380)7/13/1998 2:45:00 PM
From: Ga Bard  Respond to of 7039
 
Yep I watched that myself. The SEC is starting to name 'others' in their cases also (Ex. MINE, DFNL, etc. etc. etc.) There is even an article in the paper about GRNO where a ignorant (and from what I read that is all he is guilty of) found an investment, bought a private placement, but in doing his DD he accepted compensation for travel expenses, then wanting to willing share his DD he also accepted $600.00 for a computer upgrade and started sending out an e-mail.

When, according to my attorney, Ron accepted the compensation was when he stepped over the line of private investor to consultant. I have told people for the longest time what you post can be used against you and what is on you e-mail server can to. There are other people out to collect damages for slander also. Slander is a defamtion statementmade to a third party. Well if you make it in PM or E-mail and the person the false statement was made against can get a copy then you do in fact have confirmation of a third party slander.

That CNBC was a real eye opener for some. Real eye opener. I do not know what is going to happen to poor Ron but like they always say ignorance is no excuse. I posted an exerb of that article with a personal opinion on the Corner.

GB