Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Charliss who wrote (18064)	7/13/1998 3:06:00 PM
From: dgivinvestor	Respond to of 50264

Charliss- I'm not sure I can remember all of your questions and comments but please (and this is to everyone) don't read more into my comments than what I am saying. To address what I perceive to be your overall concern is the role I am suggesting and why dgiv can't do this themselves (if I'm wrong in my overall assessment of your post, please advise): I am not suggesting anything sneaky, suspect, less than above board, in forming an alliance together to further our company's cause. I am taking it for what you say when you state you are a fellow shareholder and as such, I am certain you want to see our company do well, both from a business standpoint as well as a return on your investment. Well, so do I. ALL I am saying is that we need to put forth a concerted effort through planning to develop a logical and honest prescence to the outside world to counter the negative effects of the naysayers. Again, I'm not talking baseless hype here. I'm talking about combining together to put forth a positive and honest presentation of our company, its business, and its expectations for the future. This is what I mean by a DGIV ALLIANCE. Let's cut the bashing of each other, the bashing of people we don't agree with (often times that's me!), and start shifting to a new stance that interested investors will want to be a part of rather than the mudslinging, name throwing, and in-fighting that's been going on here. I can tell you that I would stack myself up against anyone as far as being a true long term dgiv investor. And yet, despite this, people have accused me of being a shorter, a mm, a shill. Why? Because they didn't agree with what I had to say or how I said it. There's nothing wrong with being friends and bs'ing on the thread but the way I see it we're all here to make money and to do so in an honest and legitimate way. Yes, dgiv has their own business strategy and does not need our help in telling them what to do. That's not I meant. I meant that as co-owners in our busines, we need to work together to shift opinion and momentum on the NET which will continue to serve as a mainstay for information for most BB investors. How we are perceived on the Net is directly proportional to their perception of our company. To accomplish this end is what I'm talking about in terms of planning and strategy. I believe we can develop a plan to counter effect the negative comments on the thread that are baseless. However, we can only do this by being partnered-team members and get rid of the nipping at each other's every word and comment. I write a lot and I say things that are often misinterpreted by others, intentionally or intentionally. No matter. My purpose is wholesome and I intend to what I can to help our image, personna, and sentiment to potential investors by presenting professional and truthful facts. In regard to why you don't receive information from the company I addressed that in an earlier post (as Mr D has). DGIV is not going to haplessly continue dishing out bits of information to everyone and anyone who contacts them because this practice has led, although done with good intentions, to more harm than good. However, you need to keep in mind that people who have had long term relationships with the company are always likely to be able to dig out things about the company from various sources that the masses may not be able to obtain. No different than in police work. While much information is withheld from the general public and even the press due to the nature of investigatory work, there are always people who have particularly close associations with certain law enforcement people who are able to get a "scoop" where others can't. This is the way the world spins. This happens in politics everyday. This is not a bad reflection on you or anyone else and is not meant to be special treatment of any one individual but rather it's the nature of relationships and friendships. People always work more with people they know and trust than others. I don't know if this answered your concerns or not, but I welcome any further comments you may have.