Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ramsey Su who wrote (12320)	7/13/1998 4:22:00 PM
From: CDMQ	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 152472

When I left for work this AM we were making a few bucks. I'm not a sophisticated investor but it seems to me this stock is being manipulated. This is worse than marginal investor relations. Fo those of you who know more of the ins and outs of trading, is this possible? How can so much be so right and the stock go down!! Thank God for INTC, LU and MSFT! I'm going back to my rum and coke!

To: Ramsey Su who wrote (12320)	7/13/1998 4:46:00 PM
From: Greg B.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Ramsey, Should have let you post the RCR News article to bump up the stock two more points. <g> I re-read it again, and came to same conclusion that it cast the Q in a positive light. Maybe people think Sprint PCS Q-phone inventory was larger than originally thought. No matter the size, wasn't this already accounted for as a warranty expense? Swasey says "With so many different technologies, so many different ways to please the customer and the prospect that handsets produced today may be out of vogue very quickly and useless in five to six years, a lot of companies may wait to see if 3G is a reality." Maybe I'm missing something, but are handsets supposed to have a 10 year lifecycle? Not only that, but this guy also totally missed the truth behind the cell-phone jokes told in Lethal Weapon 4. Regards, Greg