SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : PFE (Pfizer) How high will it go? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: BigKNY3 who wrote (4297)7/13/1998 8:17:00 PM
From: Anthony Wong  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 9523
 
From Smart Money: Bull and Bear Funds
July 13, 1998 7:32 PM

NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--Fund managers tired of
being drubbed by the S&P 500 Index are now quick to
promise they will outperform in a bear market. Don't be
so sure. The truth is that fewer funds consistently
outperform in bad times than in good. We constructed a
screen to identify stock funds that have beat the S&P
500 in four down months dating back to 1990. Only
four funds were able to do that, and still outpace the
S&P 500 over that nine-year span.

Theoretically, a smart stock picker should be able to
sidestep the pitfalls of a floundering market. Just pick the
lesser of the 500 evils in the S&P.

Or, go to cash. But there are few fund managers that are
able to do that each time the S&P slides. And even
fewer who can beat the S&P when it is climbing and
when it is falling.

To identify our bull and bear funds, we screened for
funds that beat the market in each of the three most
recent one-month periods in which the S&P January
1990 (-6.72%). The funds also had to outperform
during this May's 1.72% decline.

What we found was that many managers outperformed
in each individual bear month. But only 80 (excluding
gold, balanced and bond funds) outperformed in all of
them. "There will always be 15% or 20% of funds that
will beat the index at any given time," says financial
planner Jeff Buckner of Zero Alpha, an investment
group that only buys index funds. "But it's a different
batch of funds each time." It gets worse. Of those 80
bear-beaters, only four managed to outrun the bull -
Oppenheimer Main Street Income & Growth (MSIGX),
Vanguard Specialized Health Care (VGHCX), Fidelity
Growth and Income (FGRIX) and GMO Core III
(GMCTX). Each has beaten the S&P's exceptional
18.1% average annual return since the start of 1990. Of
those, only one - Vanguard Specialized Health - has
kept pace with the index year-to-date, returning 23%
compared to the S&P's 20.3%.

Not one of these managers beat the market by timely
moves into cash. That's a risky and generally
unsuccessful strategy. Instead, they held positions in
industries like health care that are growing quickly but
also have recession-resitant earnings.

The Durability Of Aspirin Demand

Why is Specialized Health inoculated against bear
markets? Vanguard's Brian Mattes has a theory: "People
will stop buying boats and houses, but they won't stop
buying aspirin. It's a durable kind of purchase." So the
earnings at core holdings like drug-makers
Warner-Lambert (WLA), Pharmacia & Upjohn (PNU)
and Pfizer (PFE) are recession resistant. And their
stocks are less volatile. Consider that when the S&P
dropped 6.7% in January of 1990, Pfizer fell just 1.4%,
and when the market fell 9% the following August, that
stock lost only 6.5%. During this May's mini-bear,
Warner and Pharmacia & Upjohn actually rose in price.

Forrest Berkley comanager of GMO Core III also holds
Pfizer among his top ten positions. Echoing Mattes, he
says, 'Even in a down market, people get sick." And the
stock fits Berkley's strategy of buying companies whose
earnings will hold up during a recession.
"You want a
company that people are going to use its product even if
times are tough," he says. "Microsoft (MSFT) is the
perfect example of that. People are addicted to their
computers worse than cigarettes. They've got to have
their fix." The fund also own Intel (INTC), which,
Berkley admits, "has its ups and downs, but it doesn't
swing wildly from one quarter to the next and it has very
little debt." Our two remaining bear-beaters are growth
and income funds. In fact, 28 of the 80 that beat each
bear month fall in that category. Why does that group
hold up? Because they often buy securities that pay
dividends, and thus provide a cushion in a bear market.
But Oppenheimer Main Street Income & Growth and
Fidelity Growth & Income don't have big yields.

Instead they get their ballast from health care stocks -
just like Vanguard Health and GMO Core III do.
Oppenheimer and Fidelity have 11% and 17% of their
respective portfolios tucked into health care stocks.

We can't promise that these managers will beat the next
bear.

But, their stockpicking skills so far have clearly
separated them from the pack.

For more information and analysis of companies and
mutual funds, visit SmartMoney Interactive at
smartmoney.com