Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (59941)	7/13/1998 8:50:00 PM
From: Ron Burns	Respond to of 186894

Isn't it great how everyone is talking of earnings rather than the pinheads arguing over wafer diameters...

To: Road Walker who wrote (59941)	7/14/1998 12:21:00 PM
From: gnuman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

John Fowler, re: <what if you are 100% wrong about the strategy and motives of Intel?> Well, that's the thing about opinions, you could be 100% wrong, or 100% right, or somewhere in between. And if it were based on facts it would be a statement, not an opinion. The reader can form his own opinion of an opinion, as you have. So what's wrong with that? This thread is full of opinions. If they're favorable to Intel they are often assumed to be fact. If they aren't, they're often labeled BS, as you have mine. And I have no problem with that either. And if my opinions are 100% wrong, (which, in my opinion they're not ;-) ), so what? At least agree that a public forum allows opinions to be expressed. And if you have followed my posts for some time, you would know I am long Intel. And if that seems strange to you, then you don't understand my participation on this thread. This is an investor thread. Just trying to add a few ounces to counterbalance the ton on the other side of the scale. Like everyone else here, I'm hoping Intel provides positive 2H guidance. But in my opinion ;-), it won't be as positive as us Intellabee's would like.