Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Plasma Environmental Technologies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gweston who wrote (256)	7/14/1998 10:32:00 AM
From: Buckey	Respond to of 420

Thanks for the insight. They kept it afloat maybe we would be toast if not. BTW - we have a buyer - somebody hit the offer - An UPTICK. Or is it one of us fools averaging down?

To: gweston who wrote (256)	7/14/1998 4:27:00 PM
From: topstock	Respond to of 420

Great Post... I know of a Broker who is hated because of this whole ordeal. Hope to be on the ASE soon... Regards, TOPSTOCK

To: gweston who wrote (256)	7/14/1998 11:45:00 PM
From: Fass99	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 420

"smart people buy at times like this dumb people buy where I bought it the first time." Or, "dumb people" can otherwise be known as guys who almost make good stock picks on their own but, in a moment of temporary insanity, buy on the suggestion of others. Ah well. I'll just wait for the ASE and another one of those insane Canaccord promos. I won't wait three seconds to put in the sell. You want to really win in the markets, folks? If a guy gives you a "hot" tip, follow this simple two-word strategy: SHORT IT!!! See how many times you come out on the winning end. At the very least, remember the ode: buy on rumor, sell on news.

To: gweston who wrote (256)	7/23/1998 1:19:00 PM
From: Marc Bracken	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 420

Your comments regarding the exercising of warrants by officers are very serious. Where did you get this information? As a shareholder (who was involved in a private placement with PLAS) I would confront them with this if it is true. It seems incredible that they would have continued this after the stock took a very serious dive, as they were attempting to arrange another PP at the time. You would have thought that they could have paid themselves from the proceeds of the placement.