Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : FPA Medical Management - FPAMQ -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Vanni Resta who wrote (901)	7/14/1998 3:12:00 PM
From: Douglas V. Fant	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1110

Vanni, Volume is non-existent today-on a stock which until late had superheavy volume.... With the upturn in the MACD Line and with the Money Flow Index pointing up (note: the up/down tick ratio is still a negative 0.3 and has been stuck at that reading for about eight week straight), I think that this "submarine" is now sitting on the bottom of the Mediterranean. The question is whether the FPAM Management just like the German Crew in the Movie "Das Boot" can de-ballast and right this ol' ship and head back to the surface.... But I agree with you- a downside of 7/8ths and a large potential upside- I'll sit and wait to see what happens..... Also did you notice the repeat news message posted by FPAM on July 10th. The message was identical to its previously posted message- with one exception. It took out the five word reference to a potential bankruptcy filing. Now was this just a coincidence or intentional? Sincerely, Doug F.

To: Vanni Resta who wrote (901)	7/15/1998 12:10:00 AM
From: Ben Beale	Respond to of 1110

Thanks Vanni. Charming as always. r/s Ben

To: Vanni Resta who wrote (901)	7/15/1998 9:39:00 AM
From: Jock Hutchinson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1110

Vanni: I wonder how many people currently on this thread know that you have been hyping this stock since it was in the mid-twenties. Moreover, how many people on this thread know that you go on other threads claiming to have made money as a long on this stock, since you have posted on at least two occasions that you made money on the only two bounces it has had since it came down from the mid-teens. Now you claim that the risk reward of an investor losing all of his money is less than the potential of making five times his money--a figure that you have pulled out of your hat. That is absurd. Capital preservation is always the name of the game in investing. If you lose 50% on a stock, you need to make 100% on the next trade of a stock. Worse yet, once you have lost all your money you become relegated to posting absurd messages on SI. Having reviewed your recent posts, they seem to be confined to four different topics--Thread Morons, Tasteless Jokes, FPAM, and spamming IOM. Thus, while it is obvious that you participate in SI for "fun", because your asset base has become virtually non-existent, people who are new to this thread should know that you have a very poor record, and an even worse record about claiming you have had successes. And as you know, Vanni, you have attacked me as a liar even though I have posted the very posts of yours that you claim do not exist. Indeed, you have indicated in one post that you wanted to write some sort of newsletter because people who are members of SI are gullable. So let me put this together. You want to make a living selling stock advice to members of SI because they are gullable, you more than any other member of SI have recommended the worst performing stock in the entire US market for the past three months (as per Barrons) and your participation on SI is limited to Thread Morons, Jokes, spamming Iomega and promoting FPAM. I would say that you are truly a pathetic person who needs to be ignored, but I think your record speaks for itself.