SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DMaA who wrote (16622)7/14/1998 3:35:00 PM
From: Moonray  Respond to of 22053
 
Net defamers at risk after Ontario court ruling
The Financial Times - Posted at 6:35 a.m. PDT Tuesday, July 14, 1998

TORONTO -- People who make defamatory remarks on the Internet
may become more vulnerable to legal action following a Canadian court
ruling that forces several Internet service providers to reveal the
identities of subscribers using pseudonyms.

The Ontario court order was obtained by Philip Services, a Canadian
waste recycling company which has alleged it was defamed in an
Internet discussion group by individuals using pseudonyms.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation, a U.S. free speech advocacy
group, said the court ruling, which came to light last week, was ''very
disturbing.'' Foundation president Barry Steinhardt said the ruling
seemed to provide Philip Services with private information.

It also threatened the ability of individuals to use pseudonyms on the
net.

But David Potts, a Canadian lawyer specializing in Internet libel, said
the decision served notice that people must ''act the same way online
as off-line.''

Mike Godwin, an authority on cyberspace rights, predicted there would
be a similar outcome in a U.S. court should a corporation seek the
identity of an Internet user alleged to be defaming it. The ruling could
prompt other businesses to launch similar legal actions to identify their
online critics, U.S. libel lawyers said.

The case may also have repercussions beyond the jurisdiction of the
Canadian court. George Clark, a media and libel lawyer at Reed Smith
Shaw and McClay in Washington, said legal decisions involving the
Internet were watched closely around the world because of the global
scope of cyberspace.

Philip Services, a former stock market darling, has recently seen its
share price plunge by about 80 percent after suffering trading losses,
the departure of key officials and accounting errors that forced it to
restate results and reveal big losses.

Internet users with pseudonyms, posting messages to a board
maintained by Yahoo!, the U.S. online media group, made allegations
about the company and its executives which the company felt were
highly defamatory and abusive.

The court order will provide Philip Services with account information as
well as all Internet messages sent by about 10 individuals. While
individuals can use a pseudonym online, their real names and addresses
are known to the service provider for billing purposes. It was not clear
how Philip Services intended to proceed.

The company is not alone as a target of self-styled business
commentators on the Internet. Microsoft, for example, is frequently
lambasted in Internet chat groups and Intel fell foul of online critics
when it discovered a flaw in its original Pentium microprocessor chip.

Yet neither Microsoft nor Intel has brought legal action. To do so
''could have a chilling effect on free speech on the Internet, which we
have staunchly defended'', Microsoft said. Intel said it would not want
to limit open discussion, no matter how critical.

Mama was right, "If you don't have anything good to say,.....".

o~~~ O