Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brent D. Beal who wrote (57169)	7/14/1998 12:46:00 PM
From: Rocky Reid	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 58324

You have posed a very serious charge and I am considering the legal alternatives: "...and who refused to deny that fact* that he is being paid to post negative information on thread)"* Substantiate what you claim as "Fact." Or remove the offending post. Thank you.

To: Brent D. Beal who wrote (57169)	7/14/1998 12:52:00 PM
From: Rocky Reid	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

>>I think I'll stick with the press release.<< So in other words, you think that the Conference Call Zip sales numbers are incorrect? Would these be lies on the part of Iomega execs, or just honest mistakes in accounting? One has to be wrong. Either the news release you cite, or the Conference Call Zip sales announcements by KE/Sierk. Which is it?

To: Brent D. Beal who wrote (57169)	7/14/1998 1:01:00 PM
From: Zakrosian	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

By the way, would you please explain to me exactly how IOM is maintaining revenues when the average selling price of the Zip has dropped by nearly 40% over this time frame and sales have dropped by 40%? The fact that the price of the Zip has dropped so significantly and overall revenues has stayed relatively flat seems to refute your little arguement. Brent - One possibility would be that a greater percentage of IOM's revenue is coming from sources other than the Zip.