Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MGV who wrote (3369)	7/14/1998 2:50:00 PM
From: lws	Respond to of 27311

Mark, While I don't see how the information I supply will be germane to the exercise, I agree to your terms (within reason) on the presumption of receiving a sincere and best (within reason) effort from you. If on a par with your "anti" efforts, the results should be interesting for me, you, and everyone else who is serious about viewing the matter from every possible angle. However, my information must await a post later in the day. Regards 'til then.

To: MGV who wrote (3369)	7/14/1998 3:34:00 PM
From: Robert Einstein	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 27311

I know for sure that you work for ULBI

To: MGV who wrote (3369)	7/15/1998 3:40:00 PM
From: lws	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Mark, My reply to your set of questions became lengthy, so I have sent to you via SI's private mail -- however that works. Let me know if you can't get it. Hope to see your analysis soon! Regards,

To: MGV who wrote (3369)	7/16/1998 10:29:00 PM
From: Mark Johnson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Mark I thought you were going to compose a bullish case for VLNC from the challenge by lws. Have you in fact declined the challenge? If so why? You came on the scene at an important juncture in the companys future and as a newcomer you have flooded the internet with exaggerations and presented your own conjecture with enthusiasm. lws said in regards to a pro-vlnc argument" It seems to me explicit distinction along these lines would help get to the heart of the debate between you and the others -- and would be of great value to the rest of us "jurors." The jury is still out Mark, and awaiting your response. Are you up to it?