To: David Semoreson who wrote (15397 ) 7/14/1998 3:54:00 PM From: Marc Newman Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 213182
Reasonable post, David. If not for the iMac I'd think this was a fair price too. Instead, a $39 price would tempt me to sell everything (except one share, natch). I agree that it is likely that most of us trading AAPL right now are holding for just a few points upside from here. However, it seems to me highly likely that Apple will either come in at estimates or well above. It also seems to me that unless Apple misses the quarter badly (.23 or below) that the conference call is more important than the actual results. The difference between June and July is that the iMac buzz is getting louder and louder, IMHO. I feel that unbridled optimism on this thread is only equal to the negative influence of one minor news organization. (Take your choice from among many candidates.) You said it yourself, that the analysts will find any chink in the armor. If you are referring to optimism in the stock price, I see it the other way. Ie, that mutual funds are doing their homework and buying into AAPL in a big way. It's reassuring, to me. Anyway, if one wants to be very cynical, Apple has a history of stuffing the channel. There's no way they miss this quarter. With a big quarter (by all accounts) coming up, the company could make up for stuffing at the end of this one. So I see 10% chance they miss, 45% they come in at .30-.39, and 45% it is .40 or higher. The delay in the PBs gives the quarter some spice--if the 14.1" screen models had rolled out a month earlier there would be no drama whatsoever. My reasoning has been that the PBs shipped just enough that I don't have to worry about holding through earnings. But strong retail sales (Apple increased market share from last year by 10%) and possible strong education sales (production lines running overtime for the AIO's, etc.), plus the low cost structure of the "new" Apple, gives room to the upside. I'm also heartened by the report that Apple's sales were 26% higher in April than in April 1997, and 9% higher in the May period. FWIW, Marc