SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jack who wrote (4193)7/14/1998 5:29:00 PM
From: JOHNNY 5 QWEST  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 25548
 
TO JACK, NOT THE QUESTION I ASKED ABOUT WHO IS DD, BUT VERY INTERESTING READ.SOUNDS LIKE MEDINAH IS ON THE TAIL END OF THAT PROPERTY DISPUTE IF DAY CLAIM OF PAST VICTORY DELAYED ONLY TO THE
NAME SWITCH PROBLEM IS TRUE. DIDN'T MEDINAH SAY THAT THIS IS STILL ONLY A SMALL PORTION OF THEIR INTERESTS ANYWAY, AND IF THATS TRUE THEN
WHY ALL THE PANIC. DOES ANYONE KNOW IF THE LAST 100,000 SHARES AT
.13 WERE BUYS OR SALES?



To: jack who wrote (4193)7/14/1998 6:55:00 PM
From: Ancil  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25548
 
Canadians will find there equity in there accounts down by a large %. In the A.M. from there brokers. They will demand more money in the account or to have there stock sold out at market . This is a MM dream come true.

THIS WILL BE LIKE AN EARLY MONTH END FOR THEM!!!!!



To: jack who wrote (4193)7/14/1998 8:36:00 PM
From: EtTuBrute  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25548
 
With regards to equal access to the press, why didnt this paper print MDIN's rebuttal?? How about the properties that are not in dispute that are CLEARLY within the DAY boundaries??????????