SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scott McPealy who wrote (10432)7/14/1998 9:22:00 PM
From: almaxel  Respond to of 64865
 
Hi Scotty,
where is Dell's software? And how much would that be?

Ralf



To: Scott McPealy who wrote (10432)7/14/1998 10:06:00 PM
From: Michael L. Voorhees  Respond to of 64865
 
Pealy: Do we have to use MICROCRAP software? Seems like the Dell hardware doesn't work with their software.



To: Scott McPealy who wrote (10432)7/14/1998 10:27:00 PM
From: paul  Respond to of 64865
 

yeah - but all you get is a Dell and you still have to pay $5 more to add insult to injury. So much for your high end graveyard.

is Dell willing to discount that $10,000 by the way? last time i checked they didnt. But on the bright side you could run Solaris for Intel on it and make the best of the situation like Intel seems to have figured out since i assume Xeon customers are looking for scalability, reliability, managability etc.. all those vexing little things which the next version of NT is supposed to solve - check it out at their XEON launch page to see how the Sun is shining on Xeon

intel.com



To: Scott McPealy who wrote (10432)7/14/1998 10:30:00 PM
From: cheryl williamson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865
 
Scott,

Great! The customer can either buy the Enterprise 250 & get
the best RAS (reliability,availability,service) for a competitive
price, or, if they just HAVE to buy a Dell, they can run Solaris
on Xeon. Since, Solaris has the fastest benchmarks of
anyone on Xeon, & since Solaris is scalable and secure, as well,
the potential customer is in a win-win with workgroup service at
a pretty good price.

The ONLY way the customer can fail is to select a Dell running
NT (=big mistake). Besides being inferior, technically, NT is
also more expensive for workgroups over 25 seats. This is because
MSFT doesn't site license it.

The message should be clear, even to you: grow and expand with
a SUNW system (software only OR software & hardware) or get
corn-holed by MSFT.



To: Scott McPealy who wrote (10432)7/15/1998 1:17:00 AM
From: Charles Tutt  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 64865
 
It sounds like Dell is going to have to lower their price. <g>

JMHO.



To: Scott McPealy who wrote (10432)7/17/1998 12:22:00 AM
From: paul  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865
 
Dear Mr. McPealy - and to think after all this time i thought it was just you:

From upside.com

..Seems like every quarter there's somebody calling Sun the next Apple and every
quarter Sun keeps beating estimates. This time the company said the good quarter
was helped by sales of servers and workstations. Really? I thought it was all the
Java branding.