Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hugh M. who wrote (4238)	7/14/1998 9:16:00 PM
From: Handshake™	Respond to of 25548

There must have been since little has been said about the Santiago properties. I still say we are not seeing both sides of the story and that apples are not being compared to apples. Or should I say carrots to carrots. Oh by the way, hugged a big southern pine this morning. Damn that bark felt great!. I now know what I have been missing! :-)

To: Hugh M. who wrote (4238)	7/14/1998 9:19:00 PM
From: EtTuBrute	Respond to of 25548

Here is my take on DAY. Todays DAY press release stated they had refinanced debt. Bank probably brought land ownership dispute to attention of DAY, and told them to make some representation as to ownership issue as part of refinancing. Coincidence that DAY announcement on debt restructuring comes a day after this MDIN announcement?? Funny how DAY doesnt say a word about properties that are not in dispute which are CLEARLY within DAY's boundaries. What about these properties?????????????????? As to Ancil, your not worth responding to. Please give us your real full name, and what state, providence and country you live in. GG