To: ShoppinTheNet who wrote (14258 ) 7/14/1998 11:06:00 PM From: jbIII Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20681
SK, Well there has been quite a good bit of interesting reading here the last few weeks. Point-Counterpoint, parre-thrust, camp1- camp2 if you will. I was guilty of some of the idle chit-chat before this latest round of discussion, but imo that's a big part of what SI is all about. Communicating with people you don't really know, getting their opinions, forming bonds of trust or distrust as the case may be. In any case, the big question Recovery or Resource? For what it's worth, I think those that would prove a Recovery process first are putting the cart before the horse. Does it really matter if J/L can get 1,2 3 opt if there is only 100 tons to process? On the other hand if they continue to prove up a respectable amount with SFA, delineate the resource to depth and throughout the FL playa, then they will have something to sell. It seems to me that there are many variations on the recovery theme that may be available, if it's J/L great, but none work on no gold. SK you really hit the nail on the head when you said "Their fear is that they are wasting valuable time" . Everyone has a different time horizon for what this investment means to them. Many have been involved a lot longer than me , some 10yrs maybe more, and you really can't blame them for wanting a return on their investment. Of course I would love to see Naxof go through the roof tomorrow, who wouldn't? I just don't want to see it crash and burn or dry up in a desert without giving it the most practical shot. Thanks everyone for all your posts, they are educating and entertaining. Best regards, jb3 ps sorry for all the really bad cliches pps ThePJ, since you like to take credit for previous posts , I thought I would too, please see #reply-5003070.