Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : James Cramer Skeptic Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: James J. Cramer who wrote (467)	7/14/1998 9:36:00 PM
From: Broken_Clock	Respond to of 1254

Wouldn't a retraction in writing be more appropriate than just stopping?

To: James J. Cramer who wrote (467)	7/14/1998 11:10:00 PM
From: joe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1254

JJC; I got a good chuckle from your response. Sorry you have to go through this BS, but at least you're doing society some good. The guy who set up this site might go and mow down a bunch of kids at a playground for all we know. Keep up the fine work! joe

To: James J. Cramer who wrote (467)	7/15/1998 1:12:00 AM
From: grok	Respond to of 1254

This is fabulous!!! If this continues it might even bring accountability to the web. Maybe people will have to think before they flame. Almost too good to hope for. By the way, James, that was a great column on "the Options Firefight Over Intel." I'm looking forward to the translation on Saturday. KZNerd ------------------------------------- "I responded that she had libeled me and that she had better cease and desist in telling lies, which is all they are. She wouldn't even tell me who she was and said she did nothing wrong. I then called my lawyers and I am waiting for their response. You can't lie about me and expect that I will just say, "say whatever you want, I am a good guy." I fight back."