Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (6700)	7/15/1998 1:55:00 AM
From: Rod Currie	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 14226

Zeev, I 'tap in', from time to time, but participate little. As emotions erupt and 'concentrate', logic seems to 'dilute' and fade. I wander off wondering just what it is that I am really reading. For whatever the reason, 'precious metals' don't seem to bring out our best and most cautious analysis qualities. Pity. It seems to be an area that requires them most. Good news has been depressingly sparse on the Desert Dirts. Hopefully, this particular GPGI shareholder is witnessing the fruition of some positive 'reality' for a change. 'Profitable Production' certainly has a nicer ring to it than 'Expensive Exploration', don't you think? Now . . . ., The interesting aspect will be our own convoluted attempts to factor in the 'standard volatility dance' that [will?] jerk these shares around, combined with market reactions due to eager 'anticipation of events'. I suspect that few will wait for a 10,000 processing ton day before they adjust the share price accordingly - assuming that such a direction exists. This is hardly a crowd that requires 'Viagra' to get an extended rigid digit over precious metals possibilities. Hark! Over there!! Is that not a Steve Huskey in the distance, drooling gently down one cheek, excitedly pawing over a raft of T.A. charts? He must be in seventh heaven now! The real questions arise, however. Are we going to be wrong again, responding, supposedly 'correctly', but to 'bad' inputs? We've done _that before! Is there indeed light at the end of the tunnel, other than that of an on-coming rushing headlight? Will driving a 'hot' Jensen speedster finally get us past the lonely barren sands of an overly distant furlong? Let us hope so. We are truly overdue. . . Rod Currie [Hollywood Beach, Ca.]