Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : NewKidCo International (OTC:NKCIF) (TSE:NKC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SemiBull who wrote (1989)	7/15/1998 1:50:00 AM
From: Mike McFarland	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4231

SemiBull is either getting nervous or is accumulating shares. Hmmm, shares were a little cheaper today, tasty! Hope I'm right (Anybody notice my portfolio isn't public anymore) brave and reckless is he, yes...young Jedi needs to learn patience. (A little rummy at the end of a swing shift, see ya later, keep the faith! With any luck nobody gets stopped out til Softquad's bot out at three bucks a share by___:-) G'nite!)

To: SemiBull who wrote (1989)	7/15/1998 2:02:00 AM
From: esecurities(tm)	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4231

>>Any chance of SWEBF switching to AMEX ...don't think so but could be a solid possibility...however, SWEBF management does not appear concerned about a temporary delisting should it occur...apparently given their confidence it will be short-term and possibly in addition to fact that the TSE is not a bad short-term backup/contingency listing given it is perceived as the NYSE of Canada. >>Also, understanding the history of the L&H contractual >>claims, etc., how much damage would you place on >>SWEBF in the short, intermediate and long term... Pursuant to SWEBFs SEC Form 20-F [essentially a 10-K for a foreign NASDAQ filing company] filed June 29, 1998 SWEBF management stated the following "...In December [1997], the Company announced that it had instituted an arbitration action against Kurzweil seeking an estimated $9 to $12 million in damages for breach of contract, plus consequential and other damages...The Company believes that its claims are meritorious and will result in an award in its favor. However, in the event that there is an award in favor of Kurzweil on Kurzweil's counter-demand, there could be an adverse effect..."