Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: the Chief who wrote (9927)	7/15/1998 8:40:00 AM
From: Patrick Lauder	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

Didn't Guido admit in last years report that the numbers seemed far fetched, and that he was bound to because of the geological evidence which demanded he state the large numbers. It is the statistics and math, according to Guido, that forces him to state such large numbers, not any other reason. It's almost like he apologizes for the numbers but states he has no choice. I would imagine it should always be like that. It would be wrong for the company to not reveal these large numbers if everything to get to them was done properly. Pat

To: the Chief who wrote (9927)	7/15/1998 8:40:00 AM
From: JS	Respond to of 34075

All of these "suspicions" are valid. However, the price certainly reflects the uncertainty in the story. Only time will tell.

To: the Chief who wrote (9927)	7/15/1998 9:04:00 AM
From: GC	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

< You are trading on the pink sheets for one reason, the choices your management made. So now I ask you, was this a smart decision? I await your answer!> tell us your expert experience in trading on the pinks,none Cyto mentioned that there were 11 MM on GE,Sabrina says its up to MM ,now we have no news explaining why they are on the pinks ,GE should inform investors why they are on pinks,why , why. I think IMO its not because of MM not doing the paper work I think it has got to be some kind of discouraging investors to invest in MINE at this time trying to buy shares now,SEC still pulling the strings of GE now,one way of SEC controlling GE PUT THEM ON THE PINKS. How many people that phoned their broker and asked about MINE the brokers says I can't find a quote what is the symbol again, he searches further and says it trades on the pinks,advice to investor with no computer internet connection and says my advice when something is on the pinks stay away reason very hard to trade in buying very hard in selling stay away for now wait and see if it gets back on BB FHCI still trading on BB hasn't filed any type of forms with SEC in years.

To: the Chief who wrote (9927)	7/15/1998 4:44:00 PM
From: CIMA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

Another response at Chief's request: IMO, the people running GE are not stock promoters or mining people. The company acquired the property after hearing a tale of gold from two Mormon missionaries who had travelled to this remote part of Bolivia to establish a third world aid-oriented project. They didn't realize what they had. They didn't have the money required. Now they realize what they have and they're learning how to advance the story albeit two steps forwards and sometimes even two steps back. The people in the company aren't your typical miners and they aren't connected on "the street". The status quo will trash them because of this, including the SEC. However, if the gold is there, and they absolutely believe it is, the status quo will knock on their door when they've met all the steps they must fulfil along the way.