Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : James Cramer Skeptic Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Speyer who wrote (479)	7/15/1998 12:05:00 PM
From: HairBall	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1254

AMEN, Cramer you are the draw. Sorry, if want it to stop, disappear from this thread. Regards, LG PS: Looking for your responses, is the only reason I book marked this thread!

To: Peter Speyer who wrote (479)	7/15/1998 1:13:00 PM
From: David Lawrence	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1254

I guess it's all in the presentation. For example: #Subject-15326 CNBC Maria Bartiromo Fan Club #Subject-19968 CNBC Guys - The Hunks of Financial TV #Subject-15802 CNBC's Joe Kernen - What's with that haircut? #Subject-20677 Peter Lynch-one of the world's greatest investors #Subject-6587 Warren Buffett

To: Peter Speyer who wrote (479)	7/15/1998 3:26:00 PM
From: WTMHouston	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1254

I seem to recall seeing something on the Welcome to SI Thread saying that changing the name of a thread generally needed the request of the person that started the thread......since Bull started this thread, my guess is that he would need to be the one to ask SI to change the name.......given his opening comments, I wouldn't hold my breath. That said, there is nothing preventing anyone from starting a new thread with a "kinder and gentler" title. Frankly, though, I don't really think that changing the name will have much, if any, affect on content. Those that want to flame will still be able to do so and JJC will still have to/be able to answer them. Personally, if it were me, I would prefer to be able to publicly answer my critics, no matter how they presented themselves, rather than have the discussion occur privately in PM's and e-mails that I might never see.....openness has a way of making the ridiculous sink and the legitimate rise to the top ......isn't that the whole point of SI????? Troy