Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : GLOW - Global Games, Inc. - Great Profit Potential ! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas George Warner who wrote (4733)	7/15/1998 7:27:00 PM
From: Selfop	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8879

Lot's of news all over the place with little stock movement. But you know that can happen, you know that, I am sure. Look at HVAR. Great news, stock down .03. News the last few days on ELGT, JNNE, LTGL, GNNX and no stock movement. PRWT down on good news last time. And on and on and on. Glow still holding up well even under the pressure of good news. Cendant had 15 news stories today alone on my search and it went down again and they are a reporting company.

To: Thomas George Warner who wrote (4733)	7/15/1998 9:00:00 PM
From: David A. Irvine	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8879

T.G.W., That was the most objective posts I have seen from you in a while. While still a negative post ("not that there is anything wrong with that" -- Jerry Seinfeld) I am impressed that you posed your questions without a single "this stock is crap" type of comment. The questions you asked were legit, although we all know you have a negative slant so maybe others won't give you as much credit as I did. ;) On a general note, I don't understand why people respond to the majority of your posts. The only posts I feel need a response are the ones with real questions (i.e., ones that are not asked over and over again which really can't be answered anyway due to the nature of non-reporting BB stocks), and false and misleading information. There is no reason for people to get in a "he touched me!" "he touched me first!" kind of discussion since it just drags the whole thread through the mud for no reason. Back to your post...... You are semi-correct, "Borglund has to produce substantial revenue or this stock is dead. produce it and it will take off,..." (I would leave out the word "substantial") I think any revenues will be a big plus for GLOW. I do have exception to one comment, which was "Still can't help wondering how this company can complete this work in two weeks when they cannot move from a letter of intent for Burnt Church to a signed contract in 2 months?" Creating a website and working out the details of a casino management deal have absolutely nothing in common - there is no reason to make that comment. On the subject, though, if I were asked to put up the website on short notice, I might look to find a similar site I liked and try and get a licensing deal, make minor modifications, and then just get it up and running. I could fine tune it after start-up. Just a thought.....I have no idea what GLOW's intentions are. Next you said: "by the way does anyone know how much this contract is potentially worth to GLOW stockholders? I noticed that the potential deal involves the major work of others. Won't this severely dilute the revenue stream to GLOW?" In my business dealings, I have never been hurt by having specialists on my team. The key is to get the best product you can, and the more expertise you have the better. Revenues for everyone will follow. Cheers, Dave