Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : IASCA - IAS Communications Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Klingerg who wrote (198)	7/16/1998 9:18:00 AM
From: jbal	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 365

Now this is what I like to see!!

To: Klingerg who wrote (198)	7/17/1998 1:27:00 AM
From: TelcomMan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 365

My wife worked for MobileComm years ago, they are a large, well respected player in the paging industry. The acquisition of MobileComm by Mobile Media was a fiasco, though. They just emerged from Chapter 11 earlier this year. What the heck, it's nice to see another contract.

To: Klingerg who wrote (198)	7/20/1998 12:15:00 PM
From: enginer	Respond to of 365

The following was in answer to a question I asked someone who seemed familiar with ORBCOMM and antennas (on the Yahoo OBR board). Can anyone refute these criticisms of the IASCA CTHA antenna? ENGGR: I am aware of that antenna, but I don't have details. A colleague looked into that antenna type a while back for a system operating at about 1.2 GHZ. His opinion was that the gain was extremely low and the polarization was rapidly varying. That not to say the antenna type doesn't work for ARINC's application though. I doubt it will provide any advantage over any other antenna type in urban areas. GAC