Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Chromatics Color Sciences International. Inc; CCSI -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: R. M. Rosenthal who wrote (4218)	7/17/1998 11:41:00 AM
From: George M. Coladonato	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 5736

Thanks, Your last post SURE CLEANED up this board. Did the rats leave the (short) ship? I was told, "they can run but they can't hide" Keep up the good work.

To: R. M. Rosenthal who wrote (4218)	7/17/1998 12:36:00 PM
From: Peter V	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5736

Are we to assume that you think that merely starting a thread is worthy of an SEC investigation? Last time I checked, it was not against any regulation to discuss a stock on a thread, and express an opinion, long or short. If you think the SEC has the time to check out every person starting a thread, you are mistaken. Too many people think the SEC is going to investigate every little thing they tell them. With all the stocks and all the threads on the internet, they can only choose the obvious ones, like RMIL, on which SEC halted trading in January for something the company's management failed to do, and not the market makers that were supposedly shorting this BB stock. Shorting is not illegal, nor is expressing an opinion on a stock in which you have an interest.