Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kolo55 who wrote (3389)	7/16/1998 4:16:00 PM
From: Robert Einstein	Respond to of 27311

Visnic is a ULBI employee and a fake. Don't waste your time with him. He hasn't posted since I uncovered and posted that he represents ULBI

To: kolo55 who wrote (3389)	7/16/1998 5:22:00 PM
From: mooter775	Respond to of 27311

Paul K: An excellent set of responses in your earlier posts and in # 3389. My own numbers, after several lengthy discussions with some members of management last year (and hence probably subject to revision) reflect somewhat faster rampup of production than yours and somewhat lower line speed and yield assumptions that FMK makes. Nevertheless, I am comfortable with a > 20% after tax return on sales once the plant covers indirect gs&a overhead. But the key does remain getting the production line running at reasonable (>50%) yields on a reasonably consistent basis - we'll see, but I think we'll see this in a relatively short (weeks, not months) period of time.

To: kolo55 who wrote (3389)	7/16/1998 6:07:00 PM
From: John Curtis	Respond to of 27311

Paul: Excellent post!! And should things break the way we long's hope, then your post will deserve periodic re-posting because IF thing's go well, thread newbie's(all those attracted by the "noise" I'm sure VLNC will generate) are gonna need to read your statement.. Bravo! Take a bow. Now let's see what R.C. has to say, eh? Regards! John~