Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: excalibur who wrote (9347)	7/16/1998 7:37:00 PM
From: Carl	Respond to of 10836

excalibur, Although I agree with you that Mr. Carson could be held accountable for his actions at some point, I have to echo Patrick's post in asking you, "What further is to be gained by continuing to harp on the same points?" I think everyone reading this forum understands what you are saying. Continuing to badger Mr. Carson will not likely be constructive. As for the issue of whether or not he misled investors or was in collusion with MO, that's for the courts to decide. Personally, I don't have a whole lot of sympathy for those who held KRY from $1.00 to $11.00 and back. There were oodles of opportunities to take a profit and there were lots of obvious warnings that something was fishy here. The insider sales, Whalen Beliveau's dumping of shares, Mr. Carson's "colorful" promotional newsletter, the constant ridiculing of anyone who didn't buy the party line here and at SH, and most obviously, the lack of clarity as to the legal issues before the court, should have been a huge red flag to investors. But, alas, I'm just repeating what I've been saying for months and I'm sure at this point, not many are interested.