SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Broadcast.com (Acquired by Yahoo) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sam Nizam who wrote (60)7/17/1998 1:09:00 AM
From: Francis Gaskins  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1260
 
"BROADCAST.COM IPO COULD ROCK MARKET"

By Dan Mitchell
Red Herring Online
July 16, 1998

Multimedia aggregator Broadcast.com is tuning up to
jam in the speed-metal IPO market. The offering --
expected to price Thursday night -- fits the mold of many recent successful Internet IPOs: The company has big losses; it operates in an uncertain, swiftly changing marketplace; it doesn't expect profits for years to come, and its underwriters are top-tier.

In other words, all signs point to the stock taking off.

"It's a moonshot," says John Fitzgibbon of the IPO
Reporter. "It's got that magic word -- 'Internet.'"

Broadcast.com, which changed its name from AudioNet
last May, collects content from about 350 radio stations and 17 television stations and streams it over the Net to
listeners' desktops. It also offers some full-length CDs, audio books, live sports events, and other content. It began operations in January 1996, and quickly grew to become one of the most popular content sites on the Net. Media Metrix puts it in the top 20 news and entertainment sites, and says it gets about 400,000 unique visitors a day. And with each new media partnership it forges, the company adds to its growing
library of archived material. Adding to Broadcast.com's credibility: Motorola and Intel hold significant stakes.

Loud buzz
But it's bleeding money. The company lost $2.7 million on revenues of $3.2 million in the quarter ended March 31. It has lost more than $12 million since it started operations. Gross margins are high -- Francis Gaskins of Gaskins IPO Desktop puts them at 60 percent. The top line looks good: revenues more than doubled from 1997.
But much of the company's reported sales are in the form of barter deals -- trading ads with other sites. It's hard to
pin down the actual value of such arrangements, but the company says they accounted for about 15 percent of last year's revenues.

Still, heavy losses and unproven business models haven't stopped Wall Street from endorsing Internet stocks,
especially when the company in question has managed to create a public-relations stir. "There's definitely a buzz surrounding the deal," says Ken Fleming of the Renaissance IPO Fund.

The offering had an expected price range of 11 to 13,
but that was raised to 14 to 16 on Wednesday
afternoon. Mr. Fleming sees much upside potential.
"Every other (recent) Internet IPO -- Inktomi (INKT),
Verio (VRIO), DoubleClick (DLCK) -- they are all
trading above their offering price. It's Internet mania. What can I say?"

Bandwidth blues
Broadcast.com may be popular, but it won't reach the
masses until Internet bandwidth is substantially increased.
For now, most of its offerings -- both audio and video --
are crippled by choppy sound and jerky video streams
caused by slow Internet connections. When the company
announced in May that it would go public, bandwidth
was a major concern. It still is, but with moves like
AT&T's (T) purchase of TCI (TCOMA) (which
promises to expand the market for high-speed cable
modems), it seems likely that Broadcast.com's offerings
will eventually gain in mainstream popularity.

The company creates no content of its own, but rather
acts as sort of a network for traditional media companies
to port their content online. So, for instance, a British
expatriate can have her BBC no matter where in the
world she may be. And Howard Stern fans can continue
listening once they get to work, secure in the knowledge
that they won't miss a single scatological reference.

In some ways, Broadcast.com competes with such
online radio outlets such as Imagine Radio and Spinner
(formerly TheDJ). The difference is "they're not doing
anything original," says John Adams, Imagine Radio's
program director. But, he says, that's not a bad thing.
"They have a great business model -- they're acting as
the middleman" between traditional media outlets and the
Net.