Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janic Shell who wrote (18514)	7/17/1998 9:28:00 AM
From: William Brotherson	Respond to of 50264

Cute??? While I do not like the negitive that the real Janice Shell puts out, I deplore even more your childish attempt to implicate her name by leaving the "E" off so that SI would accept your trial membership. Very poor thinking!!!!!!!! wb

To: Janic Shell who wrote (18514)	7/17/1998 9:32:00 AM
From: L. Michael	Respond to of 50264

If you are paid to bash stocks, I would think you have enough money to buy your own SI membership. L. Michael

To: Janic Shell who wrote (18514)	7/17/1998 10:16:00 AM
From: Kurt_Ruckus	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 50264

I don't recall Janice ever actually bashing DGIV. It's obvious she loathes hype and as a result isn't too pleased with unbridled enthusiasm either. I was quite surprised one day to see the actual reason she attacks MTEI, which was due to her knowledge of the overall history of the stock as it had transformed itself so many times (in so many questionable ways). She wasn't willing to accept that perhaps things had changed. I think if she didn't talk down to people so much maybe she wouldn't be so loathed. On the other hand, I'm often astonished with the frequency that a person with a contradictory view of a stock is instantly labeled a basher or shill or whatever. People need to be careful about jumping to judgement too quick when people bring up certain issues. As for the ignore button, I don't know that I would use it, even for people like David Fidler. If we all turn on the ignore and new people came here, they'd find all sorts of posts harmful to the stock with no one countering them. So, while certain individuals can really push my buttons and get me pretty upset here, I'd rather deal with the emotional turmoil and counter them, than just look the other way. I agree however that people should have that feature at their disposal to use as they please. In the end it's about personal choice.