SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Command Systems, Inc. (CMND) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: PaddyD who wrote (1001)7/17/1998 11:00:00 AM
From: Nanda  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 1956
 
PaddyD, I have always said that you must do your own DD. We all know why this stock went down. As for enthusiasm....I am still very upbeat on this one. You can not make a fast buck each time you buy a stock. I as well as lot of others did a complete DD on this company and their earnings and CC surprised us. I took my lumps too. If you are on SI to look for gurus to follow them without your OWN RESPONSIBILITY, you are looking for trouble. So my friend, relax and stop blaming others where they have no control. Incidentally for missing on this one....friend I have a long list of them!!!!



To: PaddyD who wrote (1001)7/17/1998 12:11:00 PM
From: JDN  Respond to of 1956
 
Dear Paddy D. IT AINT OVER TILL THE FAT LADY SINGS!!

No knowledgeable person expected much this quarter. They warned that in their original CC after last qtr. and also in conversations to several on this thread who repeated it here. This is a fallen angel who will take some time to get their new business plan up and running and get back some confidence of the investing community. I thought that idea was put forth often on this thread. IF the reason for their poor quarter is mainly due to ramping up expenses and IF they have the signed contracts they are ramping up for THEN this should prove to be a profitable investment. I wouldnt judge the company quite so quickly. JDN



To: PaddyD who wrote (1001)7/17/1998 1:21:00 PM
From: Kathy Riley  Respond to of 1956
 
Nanda has always held the view this is a long term play, not that
Nanda needs defending......