Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Audio and Radio on the Internet- NAVR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: iceburg who wrote (177)	7/17/1998 5:46:00 PM
From: cool	Respond to of 27722

I guess that means we can multiply NAVR times 10 to get its true valuation---that would be OK with me. <ggggg>

To: iceburg who wrote (177)	7/18/1998 11:15:00 AM
From: Jose Matos	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 27722

Those types of comparisons mean absolutely nothing. Simply because BCST is severely more overvalued than NAVR does not mean that the market will bless NAVR will a relative market cap. The basic reason why BCST rose to above $60 has nothing to do with fundamentals. It's purely hype and irrational demand with very short supply. The key words in your statement were "Should NAVR SOMEHOW garner the same kind of of publicity...." That's a big question mark. Bottom line, both will come down real soon. Too bad you can't short BCST for another month. In any case, by the time the hype dies down and the traders find another gem to focus on, they'll both be down 50% or more. Not a prediction, just common sense. For proof, look at a 6 month daily chart of navr. Does the past week look familiar? PS. Yes, I am short NAVR (600 shares at aver. 6 3/8) Not here to flame or be flamed, just to remind you that things don't only go up, and when they skyrocket on overdrive , the fuel burns out faster. Regards.