Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Unitec Int. Controls Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Howard Jampolsky who wrote (502)	7/17/1998 9:59:00 PM
From: Bobby Yellin	Respond to of 856

I have faith in John! eom ps. there is now a thread at ragingbull.com v.uic for people who might not be SI subscribers..

To: Howard Jampolsky who wrote (502)	7/17/1998 11:52:00 PM
From: Howard Jampolsky	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 856

Earlier tonight, I made the following statement: "The large volume today was primarily due to a cross of stock at Union. It was not an internal transfer, though, but the sale of a large block of stock from one shareholder to another at a specified price." Richard Saunders, in a response to this message, wondered what I meant by the term, "specified price". The price was at $0.26. It was done at the present market price. This transaction was an just ordinary stock cross. I would like to say that at the end of trading today, the offers were between $0.30 and $0.35. The bid was $0.26. I hope that this clarifies any questions regarding this transaction. Ragards, Howard