Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Don't Ask Rambi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JF Quinnelly who wrote (11456)	7/17/1998 10:22:00 PM
From: Gauguin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71178

Yikes. Why do you watch? You wouldn't have seen that. :o) eom

To: JF Quinnelly who wrote (11456)	7/17/1998 11:15:00 PM
From: ZinMaster	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 71178

So what's wrong with a hard-on pill? I've heard nothing but rave reviews from customers and their partners. And so waht if he's 82. You want him staying home boinking his wife, or out suing his insurance company on national TV? What if there were no insurance? Viagra would probably cost about $1 instead of $10. No insurance -> fewer big settlements -> fewer lawyers -> cheap drugs. So Alex, have you looked up the molecule, or taken a guess at its synthesis? We could make a killing (so to speak) by flooding the market with cheap imitation pills. Maybe give them a spiffier name. Instead of the cryptic "Viagra", we could call 'em "Woodie" or "Stiffie" or even "Bleonard"....