SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Engine Technologies (AENG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: john griffin who wrote (1488)7/18/1998 12:56:00 PM
From: shashyazhi  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 3383
 
When Greg started the thread, this statement was made:

"The current OX2 engine fires four times as often as a 4 stroke conventional engine. For every complete cycle of a 4 stroke conventional engine, the OX2 engine has completed four cycles.
Therefore, engine capacity of the OX2 engine when compared to a
4 stroke conventional engine is calculated by multiplying the
actual engine capacity by 4."

Multiplying the output shaft RPM, 2500 X 4 = 10,000 equivalent RPM, which is the basis for my calculations.

The OX2 engine is certainly busy as it goes about its business of
apparently producing too much horsepower for an engine of that
displacement.

And busy little engines generally tend to wear themselves out faster
than larger engines which operate at more leisurely speeds.

But nothing says that the OX2 engine has to be run at the maximum
RPM that it is capable of turning until it destroys itself.

These remarks are in no way intended to condemn the OX2 engine
to the scrap heap of broken dreams.

There is a place for high output lightweight engines in aircraft and
boats. The output shaft RPM is very suitable for any propeller driven
aircraft without need for a reduction gearbox.

I would like to see the OX2 engine produced for that application, but
the next appropriate step is to prove the feasibility of the project to
an engine manufacturer who can perform extensive testing to
determine whether the concept is viable.

In the meantime, the stock remains a speculative issue. Good luck to
investors.